381
Confusing perspective (sh.itjust.works)
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Annoyed_Crabby 211 points 1 year ago

It's easier to see what it is once you see the whole scenery. It's a really clever framing, 10/10

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Also colour saturation put to the max.

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily, just different lighting. OP looks like it was taken with low-angle full sunlight.

This all sounds a bit overly complex, have we 100% ruled out witchcraft?

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago

Oh, so that's a textured wall, and not the horizon/sky

[-] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Thank you for unfucking my brain.

[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 100 points 1 year ago

I like this style, just don't know what it's called.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

I can't speak for the photography style, but that style of using walls of ice in a composition is called "impossible in 30 years"

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Haha! Oh, now I’m sad. :(

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Me too, buddy. Me too. :(

[-] Vash63@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's very optimistic of you to think humans will be around to have names for such things in 30 years.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, sorry. Is "anti-hot apartment tower made from solid aqua cola and lacking residents" better?

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

A tetraptych or pseudo-tetraptych maybe? Closest concept I can think of.

[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

The upper right quadrant is a terracotta wall that goes right up to the water. Below that in the photo is the reflexion of the wall. The left half is just normal water with no reflexion.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a really interesting composition. I'm not a fan of these kinds of things being called "unaltered"/"unedited", because after a bit of searching I can't find any evidence of that. But it certainly is not a composite.

If it's shot on film, it's possible the saturation is natural, but I can't find metadata anywhere.

[-] Chriszz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

was anyone else able to see the pic for what it is and then left confused looking for why it’s supposed to be confusing

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.

[-] Rascabin@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

You must bend the spoon.

[-] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Man-made structure in the top right

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Aaaaaaah ok

[-] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Somebody please explain

[-] MacStache@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago
[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago
[-] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. It's literally cropped from the original and impossible to argue it's unaltered

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
381 points (97.3% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

5454 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS