151
submitted 8 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] authed@lemmy.ml 62 points 8 months ago

Is he also going to stop shipping weapons to Israel? Otherwise it makes no fucking sense.

[-] P1r4nha@feddit.de 26 points 8 months ago

Of course not. Extra deliveries past congress. Not that they would block it

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Nah see, the pier can be used for both. Synergy.

[-] catch22@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Two birds with one stone

[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's actually a brilliant economic play. Instead of only arming Isreal, we should just arm both sides and get that CASH.

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I don't think they are giving/selling weapons to Gaza Strip.....

[-] Doods@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Pushing some agenda is the only benefit it ~~could get~~ is getting by supporting either side, they're both unprofitable; one's poor and the other only accepts weapon donations.

Edit: Getting oil from naval wells also makes some sense as an explanation.

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 43 points 8 months ago
[-] yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml 40 points 8 months ago

My first thought also. Developing the infrastructure to exploit natural resources under the cover of providing humanitarian aid, while simultaneously supplying the weapons that create the need for humanitarian aid.

[-] Doods@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago

It's not like that happened in every* other Arab nation.

*: You could argue some aren't. For most of them natural resources were exploited using the corrupted puppets making all of the Arab nations' governments.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m sorry, did they just say Palestinian economy? There’s no Newspeak that’s too on the nose for these people.

[-] christian@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

This is a disgustingly cynical interpretation and I really wish it wasn't realistic.

[-] abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml 32 points 8 months ago

The US has decided to militarily occupy the coast of Gaza.

[-] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 28 points 8 months ago

It'd probably be more helpful if Biden just stopped letting Israel commit genocide.

[-] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I agree, but you cant change the past, and this seems like a good step in the right direction for the future. We cant afford to look our gift horses in the mouths (this idiom doesnt work very well when pluralized)

[-] tla@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

It's a stupid gimmick - just like air drops. If the US wanted it could go and open the border crossings for aid. Hundreds of lorries a day are required. Not doing that reveals the truth - starving mainly innocent Palestinians.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Mainly innocent? Dude those babies are all hamas!

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

I don’t have the meme handy, but I’m picturing the Mac from Always Sunny pic saying “I’m playing both sides, so I always come out on top.”

With a US flag over Mac’s face.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

If only Israel was allowing sufficient aid in Gaza that wouldn't be necessary.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 8 months ago

Or, you know, bitchslap Israel and force them to stop.

[-] Doods@infosec.pub 0 points 8 months ago

But that would solve the problem as it's the only real solution, they would never do that.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Guys, don’t you know a bitchslap has to be approved by Congress? /s

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago
[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 10 points 8 months ago

It's especially unconscionable because the limit before needing to seek congressional authorisation was raised and transactions to Israel were deliberately kept below the reporting limit, so the headline should read "Biden Has Deceptively Snuck Through 100+ Arms Sales to Israel in Just Five Months".

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago

I wonder what the Israeli contingency plan is if the US were to revoke military aid?

It's a major national security concern for them, and a lot of military leaders with clout are dependent on that aid. They must have some sort of PR / Psyop operation ready to drop in such an event.

[-] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 7 points 8 months ago

I think it is a positive sign - although obviously hypocritical when they are providing lethal aid to the Israeli government while it's controlled by genocidal extremist parties like Likud and Mafdal-RZ, who are using it to create the very situation for Palestinian civilians in the first place.

The bombing of civilian homes and infrastructure, combined with shootings and so on has already killed or wounded about 2% of the population in only 5 months. However, a famine could kill far faster than that; to avoid that, the IDF would only need to not interfere with the distribution of aid, allowing NGOs to provide it. Instead, they have interfered with the entry of aid at the Egyptian-Palestinian border, bombed places where aid is being distributed, and shot at civilians seeking aid on the street with machine guns.

So anything that makes that 2% of casualties not grow to 80%, for example, and frustrates the plans of Israel's far right to depopulate Gaza of Arabs is a good start, but not really enough.

[-] Doods@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

That's assuming the US's intentions are good, and that this isn't just for show.

do you believe them? I don't, never will.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

The point here is government spending, especially with private partnership, not solving any problem. Classic corruption.

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 3 points 8 months ago

Can you elaborate?

[-] htrayl@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Oh fuck off dude.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Emergency pier that will take two months to build...

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
151 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32349 readers
565 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS