76
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That's if Israel lets them last that long. These people can't go 60 days without more support. Keep pushing people, we need to do more.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

So, reminder: there are trucks ready to rock that can deliver supplies. They’re waiting just across the border but are stopped by IDF inspectors (making sure there is no weapons, or fuel, or anything “objectionable”… just food and medical.) and by Israeli far right extremists protesting.

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

And the same requirements and inspections would be put in place on a port.

People are suffering. Providing aid should be done aggressively, with force if necessary.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 10 points 8 months ago

The US in 1944 built artificial harbors in one week in stormy weather while under enemy fire.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

If I recall, it was also uphill.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Both ways, in the snow

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

And the instructions were in French.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I didn't know Omaha was in France. The things you learn.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's one of the most documented parts of France.

[-] Subnet64@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

A landing craft to liberate a country from Genocidal maniacs you say?

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

false color ai is infuriating it destroys photographs

[-] Subnet64@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

A landing craft to deliver supplies.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

So, the plan is that the IDF will manage the beach side of the operation. These are the same people preventing aid coming through by road right now

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

It's becoming clear that this aid-by-port charade is really just a means of delaying, and subsequently withholding, food and aid.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Trump would have it built already and Palestine would have paid for it. /s

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


About 1,000 U.S. forces will be needed to build a temporary maritime corridor to get aid to the besieged Gaza Strip, Pentagon Press Secretary Brig.

There are still many logistical questions Ryder says the U.S. is discussing with partners, like who will provide security for the temporary causeway and who will distribute the aid once it gets to the shores of Gaza.

Once the ships arrive off the coast of Gaza, it will take 7 to 10 days to assemble both the floating pier and the causeway, according to a defense official, depending on conditions at sea and whether there are light sources to allow for around-the-clock construction.

Since security for U.S. troops is a top concern, a defense official said one of the biggest challenges will be anchoring the causeway, called Trident Beach.

The announcement of the plan for a maritime corridor comes within a week after the U.S. began airdropping aid into Gaza using military aircraft.

In the four rounds of airdrops so far, Ryder said the U.S. has delivered about 124,000 meals – certainly not enough to take care of the roughly half a million people the U.N. estimates are starving in Gaza.


The original article contains 669 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

any excuse to deploy american troops overseas sounds great thanks

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
76 points (91.3% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS