212
Kelly Rowland cannot escape questions about texting Nelly via Excel (www.avclub.com)
submitted 8 months ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 95 points 8 months ago

I’m familiar with a multibillion dollar international corporation that uses an excel spreadsheet to communicate between divisions.

Not email or slack or teams or the telephone. An excel spreadsheet.

The left column is where one division enters a message, and the right column is where the other division responds. For a new message, you start a new row. The file lives on a network drive.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago

But… why?

[-] radix@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago

Because that's the way they've done it since 1987, and the CEO doesn't like change.

[-] wolfkin@mastodon.social 36 points 8 months ago

@radix @gregorum I can just FEEL how super useful that was many many years ago. How utterly brilliant everyone felt when they got it working. How depressed they must feel to know it's still going.

[-] Thrashy@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Not OP, but if I had to hazard a guess, it started as a rudimentary issue tracker and grew into a formalized system over time, maybe? I've worked with many a project manager who "knew Excel" and liked to use it for things it should never be used for, and sometimes PMs get promoted and take their dumb little systems up the org chart with them.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Bypassing communication archiving requirements? Years ago, I worked for a company that logged all IM, etc, that occurred in a companies intranet. There were laws that required all communications to be preserved for certain industries.

This sounds like a workaround to avoid chat history

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Generally bypassing these auditing requirements is a punishable offense. I worked for a firm that was SEC regulated and you might be shocked at how much effort was expended on ensuring these policies weren’t being circumvented.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

"We cracked the case open when we discovered their chats in 'troubleshooting_not_secret_comms.xls'. They tried to cover their tracks through regular deletion, and they would have gotten away with it if not for one neglected PC in a disused office running an unsupervised copy of Norton Backup 1990."

[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

I genuinely don’t know. I was as flabbergasted as you are.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

It's like a wiki from the 80s!

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I used to see this a lot when a team had to engage with an external vendor temporarily (or not so temporarily), but the only approved software both companies shared was Office before Teams was ubiquitous.

In the worst case, the file wasn't able to be shared live (e.g., SharePoint), so it was just going back and forth in email attachments. That was just as much of a nightmare as you'd guess.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

So they were sending emails with a file attachment containing... messages? =⁠_⁠= How about using the emails themselves to, you know... type the message?

wtaf

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

The only thing I can muster in their defense is that Outlook search is garbage, and filtering in Excel to find relevant messages may have been marginally easier. But that's playing devil's advocate and going out on a limb.

It was probably in response to some manager saying it's not a good idea to keep documented agreements in email, so some genius thought putting those in an Excel and attaching to email was compliant with that idea.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

lol, I'll buy the search argument I suppose, but the agreements would still be in the email though right? I dunno what to think 😆

[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

That sounds just awful. At least this one is on a network share.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Delete it.

[-] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

Oh good god. I mean I just am aware that this is how this company communicates, but I can imagine the fallout if it was deleted.

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

Since it's not mentioned in the article: the device is a Nokia 9200 series Communicator. Had a perfectly functional SMS app for its era, of course.

Nokia Communicators were absolutely rad. Had a 9110 and it was incredible.

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

That article is so annoying to read

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

She should be held accountable! Why! Why, I ask!

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
212 points (95.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12388 readers
340 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
kescusay@lemmy.world