73
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Headline doesn't match what's in the article

This year's report said: "TikTok accounts run by a [Chinese] propaganda arm reportedly targeted candidates from both political parties during the U.S. midterm election cycle in 2022."

...

It warned that China's government may "attempt to influence the U.S. elections in 2024 at some level because of its desire to sideline critics of China and magnify U.S. societal divisions."

e; italicization added

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Are you objecting the lack of the word "reportedly" in OPs headline because it seems accurate to me otherwise?

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The report says (I'm paraphrasing), "There have been claims China has used TikTok to influence elections. We conclude that's possible." It doesn't say they did do it, it says they could do it, but the headline says they did do it.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No need to paraphrase, here's the quote.

China is demonstrating a higher degree of sophistication in its influence activity, including experimenting with generative AI. TikTok accounts run by a PRC propaganda arm reportedly targeted candidates from both political parties during the U.S. midterm election cycle in 2022.

This clearly says that United States intelligence has reports that TikTok accounts run by the Chinese government were used to attempt to influence 2022 elections in the USA. Is that not what the headline says?

Use of the word "Reportedly", in the context of this threat assessment, means that the agency has evaluated the reports, and while they have not confirmed them, they could not be dismissed either and were found them compelling enough to be included in the assessment. They are not suggesting here that some guy on the internet made the claim and there's no other support for it.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Adversary countries are always looking for ways to de-stabilize the US

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Allys too, we made zucc testify to congress before doing nothing about it.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

US does it too, its a game all the major players play

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

What does China’s government even want the U.S. election result to be? Putin and Netanyahu obviously want Republicans to win. NATO countries (Hungary aside, I guess) presumably prefer Democrats over MAGA Republicans (which I guess is all of them now).

I’m not really clear on what China under Xi would want. There’s a massive trade relationship that goes well beyond TikTok, EVs, and Nvidia chips. America being dysfunctional and chaotic doesn’t actually benefit China.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

America being dysfunctional and chaotic doesn’t actually benefit China.

It will when they take Taiwan in '25 or '26. Trump, being the idiot he is would probably let them take it as long as they send him some free gold shoes.

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's better to get the fascists well controlled before they do a genocide, so obviously Russia and China will support MAGAs, they don't want to fight fascism on another front than Ukraine.

I'm not saying Democrats are not fascists, what I'm saying it's they will go for the most "friendly" fascists for their interests.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Trump vows massive tariffs that could shrink US-China trade to practically nothing — and Biden has new restrictions ready to roll before election day. Either way they're screwed.

[-] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

technically every social media site can and will be used to affect elections in some way.

water is wet.

this is despite facebook and regulators turning a blind eye and downplaying privacy concerns for the last 20 years.

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Isn't what the US it's doing with Meta, YouTube, Twitter and Reddit?

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
73 points (86.1% liked)

politics

19165 readers
706 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS