226
BOEING vs NASA (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago by anarchy79@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apollo 13 budget: ~ $2.8B in 2023 usd

Boeing 737 MAX total program budget (excluding older 737 models): > $180B

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Why are you comparing the budget of one single spacecraft with an entire production run of a model of airplane? That's not a reasonable comparison.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 19 points 2 years ago

Because Boeing should have economy of scale benefits by selling $180B worth of aircraft, while Apollo 13 was a bespoke, single-use, cutting-edge spacecraft on a much smaller budget.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Wasn't it exactly the same as most of the other apollo craft?

[-] THE_ANTIHERO@lemmy.today 19 points 2 years ago

Yeah its too fair to boing because they are not sending shit tp fucking space

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

Modern airplanes are also have crazy complicated systems compared to the Apollo program.

But also the MAX eas supotti be a quick and easy upgrade to the existing 737-800, so clearly theu fucked up along the way

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Hahahaha! Well nailed!

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Because this is Lemmy

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 14 points 2 years ago

https://youtu.be/URoVKPVDKPU?si=6wAXf8ckCXTPb_UY

Wendover's video on Boeing - it's easy to see how costs spiral under their model, plus it's nice to see Sam - probably one of the biggest aviation geeks around - put the boot into Boeing.

A good waste of 20+ mins.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

put the boot into Boeing

Sounds risky, might break a foot, he should've used a brick instead.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The bricks fell off due to a software error.

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Not to mention Apollo program invented a lot of new stuff never before seen, let alone used.

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That explains how Boeing could afford 22 characters while NASA had to make do with 3.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's the "No!" Button do?

[-] altec@midwest.social 18 points 2 years ago

I believe it was a stage separation, so the No! was to keep them from accidently pressing it early.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 2 years ago

Hmmm... I wonder if this technique would help me in KSP if I put a big "NO!" over the spacebar 🤔

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Definitely worth a shot. How many passengers on your vessel? If it's <346 then you're beating average performance.

Ed: Damn I had no idea it was this bad

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Don't ask, don't tell.

[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Of note is that if this is the command module, it was built by Rockwell, parts of which eventually become Boeing. So the stickies track.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Love the printed labels on the Apollo capsule.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
226 points (96.7% liked)

memes

18467 readers
516 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS