294

(Title shamelessly stolen from this comment in the crossposted !micromobility@lemmy.world thread.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 96 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Umm that's not exactly what they're saying.

It would update a 27-year-old law to create three new classes of electric bikes based on the type of motor and how fast they can go.

Hell the ACTUAL statute is just defining what a e-bike is. You can see it here: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2024r1/Measures/Overview/HB4103

It does say class 1 can be operated by anyone, but 2 and 3 can be limited to 16 and older. Yes that's more restrictive then the past, but really it's "Defining the e-bikes" because they were poorly defined based on an almost hundred year old law.

That being said it does limit the top speed of an e-bike to 28 miles an hour, I assume above that it's now a motocycle, and honestly, that might be a good thing, because at that speed they no will come out of no where (hell at 20-30 miles an hour they still will)

This is hardly as bad as the title.

[-] Demuniac@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago

So it's literally to prevent 9 year olds going 50 on an e-bike. Seems fair to me.

[-] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Damn 1997 was 100 years ago? How time flies...

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Do they at least require insurance on anything that goes faster than 15 mph or similar?

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

If only.

Maybe we could get signage that clearly displays a bike's information such that a hit & run wouldn't be impossibly easy. Maybe we could make it made of Metal so it's durable. Call it a License Plate.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

As far as I read/understand, nope. But if it does limit the assistance to 28 miles an hour, that might be required if the bike goes above that speed. (Note: that's only the point where the power would stop assisting, not the fastest speed the bike can do.)

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

This doesn't seem so bad. I live in the PNW and have seen people absolutely hauling ass on home-made e-bikes and scooters, easily 40mph and passing traffic in the bike lane.

I'm not against people building their own e-bikes, but at some point it's not an e-bike, it's a motorcycle, and they need to be in traffic and ideally have the brakes to match.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 7heo@lemmy.ml 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago

"It is literally impossible for us not to harvest your data and sell it, so you can't come in".

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 26 points 8 months ago

This honestly makes me furious:

A 15-year-old boy... e-bike

the teen was riding with a passenger on the back.

They were riding ... on the sidewalk

The teen who died was not wearing a helmet, police said.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They were riding it on a sidewalk, through a crosswalk and someone turned into them. Of course.

One caveat I'll say is that depending on how fast they were going the laws should be that they should be with traffic, because if I'm driving and I look right I may not notice someone going 40+ mph on a sidewalk. But even then the law should be "Where do ebikes belong" officially

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Someone going 40+ MPH is doing what amounts to riding a small motorcycle down a sidewalk. That's no longer a "bicycle" thing. Imagine the howling and pearl-clutching we would be reading if someone were caught blasting, say, a Honda Grom down a sidewalk like that. Which is already illegal, for obvious reasons.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I own an ebike and I use it on the mixed use trails in my city. Mostly I have it because I often pull my kids on a trailer bike and we have hills in town.

I fear that my riding on these trails will soon be banned because people are out there driving stupidly fast on big knobby-tired motorcycles masquerading as “e-bikes.”

There are tons of Karens pushing strollers on these trails and any election now they’re going to ban my bike.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

One of the many reasons you don't ride anything on the sidewalk is that you cross driveways and crosswalks too quickly to be seen by drivers. Even a standard bike should be ridden in the road, because 15 mph is fast enough to "come out of nowhere" and be hit by a car. All bikes are road vehicles.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In NYC, maniacs ride ebikes and mopeds on both the sidewalk and the street as it benefits them. Every time I walk my dog I have to dodge the fuckers going full speed down the sidewalk. And they always glare at the pedestrians like you're the problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

One caveat I’ll say is that depending on how fast they were going the laws should be that they should be with traffic, because if I’m driving and I look right I may not notice someone going 40+ mph on a sidewalk. But even then the law should be “Where do ebikes belong” officially

40mph is twice as fast as the max (motor assist) speed of a normal class 2 e-bike, but yeah, the real problem here is lack of proper bike infrastructure.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It is trivial to kit-build an e-bike that will do this. Hell, I have one myself, constructed out of a Warp DS2 frame.

But the difference is, I also have an M endorsement and I treat my monster bicycle as a motorcycle. The law doesn't -- that's actually impossible in my state, so my bike falls in between a registrable motor vehicle and a bicycle. It also has turn signals, a car horn, a headlight, and working brake lights. But I also don't ride it like a dickhead, and that includes paths set aside for non-fire-breathing bicycles, sidewalks, etc.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

My city has amazing bike infrastructure: mixed use trails with no cars, bike lanes on all streets, tunnels and bridges over major thoroughfares (really it’s pretty insanely good and yes it’s in the US of fucking A).

People still ride on the sidewalks like morons. They ride the wrong direction in the bike lanes.

Bike infrastructure is essential but also not totally sufficient. You need a significant enough number of people using them that there is a culture for it and tribal sharing of knowledge around it.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I hate cyclists that masquerade as pedestrians. It’s less safe for them and it’s less safe for everyone. Get your ass out into traffic and learn to take up some space. Ride defensively. Get yourself a rear view mirror. Pick the most bike friendly route. For fucks sake.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I once made a left turn through a gap in the crowd downtown, then out of the ongoing crowd zips out a bike the opposite way out of nowhere. He almost hit the side of my car and of course he got mad at me, even though he was on the sidewalk which is illegal in my city, and he was riding against traffic

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't know about Oregon, but I see how people ride their e-bikes here in NYC and it makes me suspect that most e-bike/car collisions are the e-bike's fault.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I'm from Toronto, same. Also as a pedestrian, those ebikers scare me the way cars scare them. They're not allowed on the sidewalk in my city, but you'll be walking with your toddler and an ebike speeds past you on the sidewalk almost hitting you. And they'll switch between sidewalk and road depending on the traffic, so I have no love for ebikers.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

And they’ll switch between sidewalk and road depending on the traffic, so I have no love for ebikers.

This is the problem I have with bikes. They want the pros of pedestrians and vehicles without the cons of either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Oh no, sensible regulation on e-bikes. Although the initial proposal was better. Splitting the bikes into classifications. And then splitting the eligibility by class (class 1 for any age) and class 2 and 3 for 16 and older.

The accident was horrible but also weird. Biking on the sidewalk? next to a highway?? With turns??? It just reads bizarre and like a traffic system that is very hostile to anything but cars.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Remember that for state governments, "Highway" is a term of art that does not necessarily mean "elevated controlled access high speed multilane thoroughfare with on and off ramps" but usually more along the lines of, "anything paved, but not dirt." And the cops parrot this to make themselves sound like they're very officious and totally not useless doughnut-eaters, and then news outlets follow suit.

For example, my state's laws consistently use the word "highway" to refer to all paved roads that are under the purview of the state (i.e. not private roads, county roads, or municipal roads), even if they're not wide enough to have a center stripe. Then what we'd think of as a highway I believe is referred to as a "controlled access freeway."

Here is the location in question. This is definitely a Stroad, and it is certainly not a freeway. Stroads are well known to be hostile to pedestrians and cyclists. It also appears to have non-separated bike lines, i.e. some asshole just came by and painted bike icons on the existing shoulder, calling it job done.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks for that tidbit of background. Much appreciated. The location does seem hostile to anything other than cars.. that's a stroad for you.

All that space can easily fit a protected bikelane and pavement on either side with a row of trees on the separator between the bikelane and the carlane.. such a waste.

Obligatory, stroads are stupid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

They're not actually. They just needed to define what e-bikes are as a by-the-by because so far it had not been defined.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago
[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Well we clearly need to make it even more illegal then" -The Government

(Although technically was 16 year olds not allowed to ride e-bikes? If so then this is more permissive, because it says 16 year olds can ride class 1 bikes)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

The bill creates three classifications of electric bicycles. Class 1 ebikes only provide assistance when a rider is actively pedaling and stops its motor when the bike reaches 20 mph. Class 2 ebikes can be propelled without pedaling and top out at 20 mph. And Class 3 ebikes require pedaling, come with a speedometer and top out at 28 mph.

Levy initially proposed allowing anyone, regardless of age, to use a Class 1 electric bicycle and making it a traffic violation for a child younger than 16 to use a Class 2 or Class 3 ebike. But as passed by the House, the bill would ban ebikes for anyone younger than 16 who doesn’t have a driver’s license or permit. Anyone 16 or older can use any ebike.

Hmmm. I think high school is when there might be a real need for an Ebike so I'd go with that age.

What age can you get a driver's license? Does a learners license count?

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

A permit is a learner's license, and it looks like you can get them starting at 15 in Oregon, which is the case in most states.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
294 points (88.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35455 readers
97 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS