43
submitted 8 months ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 58 points 8 months ago

“I know there’s a ton of skepticism about Meta entering the fediverse — it’s completely understandable,” Cottle says. “I do want to kind of make a plea that I think everyone on the team has really good intentions. We really want to be a good member of the community and give people the ability to experience what the fediverse is.”

Doesn't matter

[-] simple@lemm.ee 49 points 8 months ago

"We have really good intentions, that's why we're working for a company that's been involved in at least two dozen scandals and breaches of user privacy. I'm sure they won't do it again."

[-] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I know of a guy who had good intentions. He just wanted to make Germany great again. I can't remember his name right now, but IIRC, it didn't end up being good for a whole lot of people.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago
[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

here's a good write up about why federating with threads is a bad idea, below is just a tidbit, I read it ages ago so just picked some dotpoints.

Less emotionally, I think it’s unwise to assume that an organization that has…

demonstrably and continuously made antisocial and sometimes deadly choices on behalf of billions of human beings and allowed its products to be weaponized by covert state-level operations behind multiple genocides and hundreds (thousands? tens of thousands?) of smaller persecutions, all while ducking meaningful oversight, lying about what they do and know, and treating their core extraction machines as fait-accompli inevitabilities that mustn’t be governed except in patently ineffective ways…

…will be a good citizen after adopting a new, interoperable technical structure

https://erinkissane.com/untangling-threads

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


During the FediForum conference on Tuesday, Meta’s Peter Cottle showed off a brief demo of how users will eventually be able to connect their accounts and posts to the fediverse.

As you can see in the video below, which FediForum shared with The Verge, Cottle can navigate to his Threads account settings and toggle on an option called “fediverse sharing.” Meta will then show a pop-up explaining what exactly the fediverse is, along with some disclaimers Meta will flag to users so they know what they’re getting into.

First, Meta notes that users will need to have a public profile to toggle on the feature, something Instagram head Adam Mosseri has already mentioned.

In other words, your post may still be visible on, say, a linked Mastodon server, even if you decide to delete it with Threads.

“I think this is a downside of the protocol that we use today, but I think it’s important to let people know that if you post something and another server grabs a copy, we can’t necessarily enforce it,” Cottle says.

The FediForum is an online event that gives developers the opportunity to show off what they’re working on in the fediverse.


The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works -2 points 8 months ago
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago

I care if it's going to mess up my fediverse experience.

[-] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 8 months ago

just pre-emptively block threads.net or whatever other domain they use

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Yup, that's the plan. I'd rather it be defederated at the instance level though. If my instance doesn't do it, I'll probably run my own.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Aren't you on sh.itjust.works?

If so we defederated

https://sh.itjust.works/post/11308397

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Cool, I totally forgot about that. Thanks!

[-] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago

I'm on the side of blocking them FWIW, more so just who the hell cares about FB

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

oh my God who the hell cares

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

We are anti-corporate takeover in here yet you host your code on a proprietary, Microsoft-owned product without providing a mirror?

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
43 points (83.1% liked)

Technology

35003 readers
249 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS