US reportedly considering plea deal offer for Julian Assange (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 29 points 8 months ago

I can't properly express the irony involved in the Trump administration looking to charge Assange (who some claims is a Russian actor, which in itself would put him and Trump on the same team) when the ex-president is now charged with the same line of indictments for keeping classified docs as bathroom reading material...

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not quite. The big thing they have on Assange is that he helped Chelsea Manning break into US databases, which is not only a computer crime but espionage. In any case, according to the WSJ prosecutors see diminishing odds that he would serve much more time even if he were convicted in the US.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Well the threat of prosecution sure has made his life hell for a long time.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah not exactly, but both in the same theme of possessing in one way or another docs they're not supposed to have.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago

I think you could liken it to robbing a bank to obtain money versus scamming a bunch of elderly people to obtain money. Both give you the same end result but each crime is treated differently.

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sounds to me like they don't really have anything on him but if they can get him to admit something they won't look so much like the bags of shit they really are.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

If they are serious about it, this would be great for him. He has been kicked around for his “crime” enough to count towards his sentence.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The US government is reported to be considering a plea deal offer to Julian Assange, allowing him to admit to a misdemeanor, but his lawyers say they have been “given no indication” Washington intends to change its approach.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the US justice department was looking at ways to cut short the long London court battle of the WikiLeaks founder against extradition to the US on espionage charges for the publication 14 years ago of thousands of classified US documents related to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

The report said a plan under consideration would be to drop the current 18 charges under the Espionage Act, if Assange pleaded guilty to mishandling classified documents, a misdemeanor offence.

The previous Democratic administration, under Barack Obama, ultimately decided not to charge Assange because of fears that doing so would infringe first amendment rights guaranteeing freedom of the press.

In 2019, the Trump administration pressed ahead with charges under the 1917 Espionage Act, seeking to differentiate conventional journalism from Assange’s actions, which provided a platform for the publication of leaked secret documents, and which prosecutors allege he knew would put lives in jeopardy.

In a hearing on Assange’s permission to appeal in February, his defence lawyers argued he could be targeted by US state agencies for “extra-legal attack elimination” if he were extradited, particularly given “the real possibility of a return of a Trump administration”.

The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 238 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

OP goes off the rails. Calm down, Javert. Assange was persecuted for his journalism. It's as clear as day

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago

That's funny. And delusional.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

"When Exposing a Crime is Treated as Committing a Crime, You Are Ruled By Criminals."

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024

96 points (93.6% liked)

World News

39026 readers

1125 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.