244
submitted 2 years ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

Interesting how they lost so many experienced people by changing the pension rules - it almost sounds like Boeing wanted newer, cheaper people to do the work.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Welcome to Capitalism!

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 25 points 2 years ago

"Move fast and break things"

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

People are things, aren't they? That's how corporations treat them.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Makes sense in normal software where a bug means someone might have to try again later. Not so much when a bug means hundreds dead.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

This is bad news for Boeing. They should probably offer a stock buyback to fix the issue.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Gone are the days of saying “I’m afraid of flying” and someone trying to convince me how safe planes are.

Now everyone just accepts they are a suicide booth like this is a normal progression of technology.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not even a safety thing for me. Planes are still much safer than cars despite what Boeing has done. It's the fact that air travel is extremely unpleasant and uncomfortable. Even flying first class can be unpleasant, just less so (I've only done it once when I was offered a cheap upgrade). Airports are loud and filled with obnoxious, entitled people, planes are even louder and there's no way to escape the obnoxious people and you have no leg room.

From now on, I'm taking the chance and driving if I can possibly do so. At least I can get out and stretch my legs and get a coffee that is larger than a thimble.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

I don't like how flying is so expensive and while statistically much safer than driving, you have no control over your own fate when in a flying aluminum cylinder tens of thousands of feet in the air.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

You don't necessarily have control over your own fate when driving either. You can't stop a drunk driver in a huge SUV from plowing into your car as you're crossing an intersection and they ignore the light.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

No, but you have more control. You have control over the condition and maintenance of your own vehicle, and you have a chance to defensively avoid collisions. Like the intersection example, I always try to look both ways at an intersection even when my light is green. If I get on a plane where the pilot is drunk or suicidal and the maintenance was not done to spec, I have no control over that.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That is sometimes a possibility, although the nearest Amtrak stations to my home are over an hour's drive and the places Amtrak goes outside the East Coast are pretty limited.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Capitalism's end goal in a nutshell.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Boeing: the Tesla of aviation

[-] Misanthrope@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

This one is a gift link tho

this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
244 points (98.0% liked)

News

35754 readers
592 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS