775

Plex, the free streaming app, laid off approximately 20% of its staff, TechCrunch has learned, which will affect all departments, including the Personal Media teams.

“This is by far the hardest decision we’ve had to make at Plex,” CEO Keith Valory said in a statement. “These are all wonderful people, great colleagues, and good friends. But we believe it is the right thing for the long-term health and stability of Plex.”

The streaming app gives users a single destination to upload and organize content (video, audio and photos) from their own server while also allowing them to stream it via mobile app, smart TV or desktop.

In recent years, however, Plex has invested in free, ad-supported streaming (FAST) and live TV offerings. The FAST market has become saturated as many companies have entered the space. Plus, the overall advertising industry has taken a hit, making it harder for companies to earn enough revenue.

Valory noted in his statement that the company was significantly impacted by the slowdown. “While we adjusted our business plan last year after the shift in equity markets to get us back on a path to profitability without having to cut personnel expenses, the downturn in the ad market in Q2 put significantly more pressure on our business and ultimately it became clear that we would need to take additional measures in order to maintain a confident path to profitability within the next 18 months,” he said.

He added that the company is still expected to see 30% growth this year.

According to a Slack message from Valory, obtained by The Verge, which first reported the layoffs, Valory noted that 37 employees would be impacted.

Additionally, it seems that Plex may have had another round of layoffs earlier this year. Five months ago, a former account executive posted on LinkedIn that they were “affected by company layoffs.”

As of January, the company had 175 employees, and its revenue was in the double-digit millions.

Updated 6/29/23 at 12:10 p.m. ET with a statement from CEO.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

It seems like in the last few years the company's focus has primarily been on adding things to Plex that I do not want as part of Plex. And not adding the audiobook support that I do want.

[-] Threeme2189@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Look up audiobookshelf if you're willing to mess with docker a bit and forward a port or two. It's open source and does a, wonderful job.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Vaseline@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

Or we could all switch to an Open Source alternative, Jellyfin, and either donate what you’d normally pay Plex or just enjoy it for free. I’ve never used Plex and started with Jellyfin. It’s gotten the job done thus far

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 31 points 1 year ago

It’s the app ecosystem for plex that keeps me there. There’s an app for my LG tv, an app for my in-laws’ Roku etc.

[-] Vaseline@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Yes you’re right, Jellyfin isn’t on many platforms but I’m pretty sure they have an app for LG and Roku (Clients here). Although the LG app isn’t the best from what I remember. What I usually do is use an Amazon fire stick with Tailscale for my family and it’s been working well. But also as popularity increases others will be able to contribute more and the apps will become better.

In case you didn't know, Roku and LG TVs have a Jellyfin app.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] jmanes@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

I used Plex for years, and it is the superior product (if you pay) compared to Open Source alternatives. However, after seeing Plex's recent incentive pivots and looking for investors I jumped shipped to Jellyfin. The thermometor of enshittification is indicating that Plex is on its way out.

Folks who haven't looked at alternatives yet, do so now.

[-] PlebsicleMcGee@feddit.uk 25 points 1 year ago

Jellyfin, caddy and duckdns can get you all the benefits Plex offers without needing to use their servers for logging in

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Ducks@ducks.dev 55 points 1 year ago

I'm honestly surprised that Plex has revenue in the "double-digit millions"

[-] HorseFD@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

Jellyfin is so good now. I used to use Plex but I have no need for it now at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 51 points 1 year ago

Oh well, worse-case scenario- at least we already have Jellyfin.

[-] briongloid@aussie.zone 31 points 1 year ago

I really hope Jellyfin gets a leg up soon, as a Plex Lifetime Pass owner I have become more and more discontent with the platform.

When I paid for my personal licence, it included downloads for all my users, now its cutoff to only older users. I had expected that Plexamp would only be restricted to me while it was being developed, but it remains locked away from my users should never individually have a reason to subscribe for just themselves.

I bought my licence to support the company for the use of my server and I feel like they've only downgraded my service in the last couple years. Getting new users to jump through all of the hoops with their pinned content, only to have them ask me why there are adverts on my movies is frustrating.

I feel like very little has improved in the core product in years, my users default settings are still transcoding to the same bitrate, or 10x its bitrate. Every time I have made a valid suggestion on the old subreddit, the Plex devs had plenty of time to reject any and all criticism.

I don't believe Plex is going to get much better and likely we will see further erosion of our licences as the company only focuses on free users and the FAST service. I will keep checking in on jellyfin and alternatives, hopefully they get a boost soon.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 44 points 1 year ago

Jellyfin NEEDS a plexamp tier music streaming app for me to consider moving unless plex completely self-owns harder than Twitter and reddit combined

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] banksymimosa@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Well they also spent the past 10 years building 80% stuff we never wanted

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago

And forcing logins to go through their centralized servers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

Unfettered Capitalism breeds emshitification.

Why build and keep a great product when shareholders will always push for more growth and higher revenue. Even if that means laying off your best devs and pissing off users.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Coeus@coeus.sbs 34 points 1 year ago
[-] smoll_pp_operator@vlemmy.net 12 points 1 year ago

Seriously. They expect 30% growth? They can afford a few salaries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RatzChatsubo@vlemmy.net 29 points 1 year ago

Why are all these large tech companies failing this week? Is AI really decimating the internet on all fronts?

[-] german@pawb.social 45 points 1 year ago

They’ve been failing for a while. It’s capitalism failing, not some magic tech entity concept like AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 34 points 1 year ago

The problem isn't AI, but interest rates.

Silicon Valley lived for a long time with an investor market that didn't really have anything better to invest their money in, so they would invest in a series of Internet companies with the hope that one of them would make it rich. Now that lending money can make you more money, it isn't worth it to invest in companies or ideas that don't make money right now.

The VC funding that Silicon Valley relied on dried up. If you are a startup, you need to be profitable before you burn through your cash. If you aren't a startup, you don't have to worry as much about new tech cannibalizing your core businesses, so they are more willing to cut product lines.

[-] chris2112@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

It's been going on for nearly a year now, but the layoffs tend to happen in waves because the stock market and investors in general tend to be very reactionary. Also a lot of companies released their quarterly earnings recently

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

investors / business / money people are stupid hogs who are blindly guessing and making the stingiest possible choices at any turn, they don't know shit or do shit

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Its not a tech issue, its a finance issue.

The tech industry has always been highly speculative. What we saw in the 2010s was only made possible through venture capital and high digital advertising budgets.

Now that there's uncertainty and investments are expensive due to high interest rates, VC and advertisers are pulling back. As a result, we're seeing a bunch of business models that have never been viable on their own have to try and support themselves for the first time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] marsta@lemmy.stark-enterprise.net 15 points 1 year ago

Money isn’t as cheap anymore as it used to be. Tech companies have been struggling for about a year now. Even the larger ones have to show profits these days (not defending them, just explaining as I’m working in tech as well)

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] jmondi@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

I only still have a plex server running for audiobook support with the app Prologue. Everything else is happy in Jellyfin and and has been rock solid. Plex went way to corporate and it creeped me out.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] ItsaB3AR@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Wow, it’s almost like those free channels the put all over my Plex that nobody wants was was a bad investment. Still love Plex as a service but I find it hard to see any value in FAST.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] capital@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Shit. I'd have moved to Jellyfin already if they had an Apple TV client. If they go under I might have to get a 2nd set top box just to run JF.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] screwtape@crystals.rest 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wasn't even aware that Plex was still around. Swapped to Jellyfin years ago.

[-] emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago

Jellyfin's the way to go IMO, screw Plex and their constant BS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

As of January, the company had 175 employees, and its revenue was in the double-digit millions.

And yet, it is not enough. Perhaps the lesson is to NOT take that VC money if you want your company to survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Protegee9850@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The evil clone of XBMC is finally in its death throes (yes I’m still bitter about that). No worry, Jellyfin is better.

[-] PoppinKREAM@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

XBMC

Wow that takes me back lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] demesisx@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Why the fuck is Plex even a company? Attention venture capitalists: Get your money grubbing fingers the fuck off decent technologies that should in no way be tied to profit-seeking. We live in a dystopian hellscape.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] gnuslashdhruv@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

As a long-time Jellyfin user, I've never really understood how Plex makes money providing a handful of additional features over the FOSS alternative.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hoodlem@hoodlem.me 17 points 1 year ago

This doesn’t surprise me. The “features” that keep being added to Plex drive me nuts. I just want to be able to browse and watch from my own library.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] supanovadova@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

30% growth after a 20% layoff huh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gobbling871@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Valory noted in his statement that the company was significantly impacted by the slowdown.

He added that the company is still expected to see 30% growth this year.

Which is which?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
775 points (97.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40438 readers
232 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS