456
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Minotaur@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Rich parents.

There’s really no other answer for this one. I went to a very nice university. The average person has no idea how many college students are coming from phenomenally high income families where price is essentially no issue.

It’s just a matter of how high up the top 10% is relative to everyone else. Both your parents are doctors and they have 18 years to save up - half a mill for Amy’s college bill is basically piss money.

The only problem is that these college students tend to grow up in areas where this is basically the norm. I had so many 19 year olds act flabbergasted that not only are neither of my parents doctors/lawyers/engineers… they didn’t even gasp go to college!

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

There are a number of states where tuition is covered if you graduate from an in state high school and then go to an in state college or university. That's how I got my degree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

People are willing to pay it, therefore they will charge it.

We badly need people in the skilled trades. The jobs pay well, are in high demand, and don't require you go go into massive college debt.

[-] Bocky@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Uneducated people are willing to pay that much. It should be considered predatory lending to sign up a 19 year old for $100k of debt

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

The government also made huge student loans widely available. So government tried to narrow the wealth gap. In response, colleges just raised their prices, and students were forced to take out bigger and bigger loans.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago

It really depends on the scholarships. If they offer common merit based scholarships that bring it down to single digits of thousands, I'd think it's okay. Same with demographics based scholarships or registered need. You'd be using the rich dumb students to subsidize making the better students pay less.

But I have a feeling a lot of places are just price gouging, not subsidizing from the rich kids.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

It got this way because younger people are willing to go into debt to get an education, and schools take advantage of that expected level of debt. I highly recommend looking up certificates that are available. One of the best ways to change this is for people to switch to alternatives.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I've stopped caring about shit like this because they get what? Another generation or 2 of offspring before the payback for all the shit we've done comes to roost? Great, some people's kids will get to continue to believe we're just fine while 95% of the planet burns ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Just to keep the poor out of studying or to get them in debt for the rest of their life, easy peasy round business..

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Scam bubble

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
456 points (99.4% liked)

News

23259 readers
1596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS