German police seize $100 million in US-bound fake bills (www.dw.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago

How will they dispose of the $90 million in fake bills police turned in?

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 19 points 7 months ago

They will obviously burn all $80 million.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Emissions laws there mean they can't burn 35 million in fake bills. They'll have to shred it.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

True. Most of the 15 million can't be shredded and will have to be dissolved in acid.

[-] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The article describes this as"prop money", but doesn't give further details.

If you're curious, Adam Savage has a number of videos from Hays Press explaining actual prop money.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drLzVcgnBfI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfYcSqxh1GU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlrX1btOH7Q

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Stacks of $1's.

TIL someone is bothering to make fake $1's.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I have never in my life had a $1, $5, or a $10 checked in my life. There could be an absolute fuck ton of fakes in circulation. No one ever checks them.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Police in the northern German port city of Kiel on Friday said they had discovered counterfeit cash worth more than $103 million.

Officials think the haul of low-quality forgeries was part of a wider shipment operation for falsified bills from Turkey, through Germany, to the United States.

Investigators tracked the company locations of a suspect after US security authorities tipped off German federal police.

The trader allegedly used one of the accused's export companies in the Schleswig-Holstein town of Jübek as an interim storage facility for onward transport to the US.

The counterfeits, also known as "prop copies" or "movie money," are not particularly convincing and can be recognized as fakes upon closer inspection.

However, they have been classified by Germany's central Bundesbank and US authorities as likely to be confused with real money in payment transactions.

The original article contains 260 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 51%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 7 months ago

"They are printing money all the time. Why can't I do that?!"

"They print so much money, this isn't even a drop in the bucket. Why would you even prosecute that?"

The US printed 3 trillion USD the last few years while exporting inflation to all uses of the USD. The stimulation checks were just a way to give some of that back to the people inside of the US who were also stolen from.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago

And the stimulus got mostly spent on rent and paying back debt, so ultimately it ended up with Wall Street, who then proceeded to buy up housing with it.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024

86 points (96.7% liked)

World News

38971 readers

2335 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.