159

After [Brian] Dorsey confessed to killing his cousins Sarah and Ben Bonnie with a shotgun in 2006, Missouri paid two lawyers $12,000 each to defend him. If they had worked 3,557 hours — the average time spent by defense lawyers in death penalty cases, according to a 2010 report commissioned by the federal courts — they would have each earned $3.37 per hour.

Dorsey is scheduled to be put to death on April 9, and a growing number of scholars, lawyers and activists are asking federal courts, along with Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, to stop the execution. They argue that regardless of how much these lawyers worked, the way they were paid created a perverse incentive: Work less to earn more per hour.

...

The lawyers who received $12,000 each, Scott McBride and Chris Slusher, declined to comment for this article. During a 2011 hearing over Dorsey’s appeal, they acknowledged they could have asked for more money for a fuller investigation but said that dwelling on his possible psychosis and other mitigating factors might have undercut their overall strategy: Accept blame, express remorse and seek mercy.

That strategy, they added at the hearing, was why they encouraged him to plead guilty in the first place. But this also happened to save them hundreds of hours of work. Dorsey’s current lawyer Megan Crane points out that they failed to use a tactic required by ethical standards: demand that prosecutors drop the death penalty in exchange for a guilty plea.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240409120214/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/04/03/execution-missouri-brian-dorsey-fees

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago

That headline sounds really weird until you read more. Basically his lawyers were paid one lump sum by the state, incentivizing spending as little time as possible on the case.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Yep, and that background is a very likely answer to the question, "How can somebody plead guilty and still get the death penalty?"

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 30 points 1 year ago

The man did terrible things, but appears to have reformed and would be spending the last couple of decades in jail anyway. There is no justice in putting him through the execution process which is regularly botched other than cruelty.

Yet another example of the systemic problems with our legal system. It is set up in ways the incentivize punishment and actively prevents rehabilitation.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The death penalty is in no way helpful to the justice system. Allowing it only gives the government permission to murder. I view it about the same as a gang murder when someone is getting even.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The man did terrible things

Maybe, but I'm not even convinced of that at this point. The police got a confession out of him for this and he pled guilty, but later on has said that he has no memory of actually committing the crime (It seems confirmed that he was a crack cocaine user at the time and it seems possible that he had a history of head injuries, which just makes all of this even murkier).

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Although he claims a lack of memory of the crime, that was for a defense against the death penalty as a punishent which requires intent. He doesn't deny that he did it.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

I don't understand why this guy murdering two people gets him the death penalty, but the US has tons of mass shootings, school shootings, serial killers, and other killers of multiple people.

What made this case so special?

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 23 points 1 year ago

He plead guilty and his public defenders didnt get paid shit, so the state AG can say that he is tough in crime.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

God damn. What a messed up place.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don’t understand why this guy murdering two people gets him the death penalty

Missouri.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I am in Missouri, there ain't nobody who can comfort me...

  • totally Bruno Mars
[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I think The Beatles have a song about that. One of their earlier ones. I am in Missouri!

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Passed tense. They already killed him.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 1 year ago
[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Assuming they spent those hours. I feel they couldn't have survived had they actually done that, and not spent that time on other cases.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
159 points (96.5% liked)

News

30287 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS