104
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] errer@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

This same group has been pushing this theory for a decade with no direct evidence. Each paper is just confirmation bias in action.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Some amateur types have been pushing this for decades with zero evidence, but as the article says, a legit pair from Caltech finally found some circumstancial evidence it could be possible, and this expanded group is just throwing more on the pile. I think it's just one of those "Well...let's say it's possible, here's what we'd be looking at for evidence..." kind of deals.

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Back in my day it was called Planet X, god dammit!

[-] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Because back in my (our) day Pluto was number, so Planet X worked. Planet VIIII doesn't look as good.

[-] 5wim@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 years ago
[-] Klear@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

That means "Boy who is not able to satisfactorily explain what a Hrung is, nor why it should choose to collapse on Betelgeuse Seven". I don't see how that applies here.

[-] 5wim@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago
[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Still trying to figure out what the hell it is

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

VIIII is a valid way to write 9, though antiquated. If you look at very old clocks, you'll see they all use this notation.

[-] 5wim@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago

Didn't realize homie was an antiquated clock. (Assumed the usage of Roman numerals, like in the references being made, in which case I don't believe the clumsy VIIII only used on old clocks would really be valid.)

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This made me really laugh. Thought I would let you know 😂

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

VIIII wasn't exclusive to clocks, that's the only long-lasting example we still have access to.

[-] 5wim@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Your point is that VIIII was ever used in history? Happily conceded.

[-] Opisek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The reason clocks use it, is to not make it look visually unbalanced. Most often they write 4 as IIII. I find it infuriating to break such a simple rule though.

But also, I've never ever seen VIIII.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Julius Caesar's memoir of war in Gaul makes use of VIIII, for instance. You're right that it's much rarer, but was still used contemporarily and in modern times.

[-] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah yeah. Same same.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, Ix, let's start naming these planets like its classic SciFi.

[-] TheControlled@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I know. I wasn't being serious.

[-] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

Nibiru. Not Pluto.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I remember that from my childhood! My mother convinced me it was probably a bad science fiction movie

[-] subignition@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

A new planet in a distant orbit, you say?
In before the signal is older than the universe itself.

[-] Charred@feddit.it 12 points 2 years ago

The downvotes are not getting the reference smh.

Science compels us to blow up the sun!

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I do not get the reference, but I can tell it IS a reference, so throwing an upvote on it lol

[-] subignition@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You should forget anything you've read in this thread and play Outer Wilds ASAP. And you should go into it as blind as possible. Trust me; you only get to experience it for the first time once.

[-] ceiphas@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Just call it Rupert already!

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago
[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 6 points 2 years ago

We can call the new planet Cerberus. On honor of Pluto.

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't we then confuse it with Pluto's moon? Imagine a family of poor future Solar system travellers realizing they got the tickets for the moon, not the planet.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Isn't Pluto's moon Charon?

[-] 9bananas@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

pluto has more than one moon ;)

[-] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah but this aren't planets. We could always just reuse the name Pluto. Then all the old books are right again.

[-] accideath@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That’s Pluto erasure. Pluto isn’t a planet but it’s damn well part of our solar system.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Kerberos and Cerberus while referencing the same thing are spelled differently.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I find it amusing that we can prove the existence of black holes thousands of light years away and glean the state of the universe at its earliest moments, but we can't decide whether there's a rock big enough to count as a planet floating around the inside rim of the Oort Cloud.

[-] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

It might be a miscalculation of orbital body models, which has happened before. Urbain Le Verrier was able to predict Neptune's existence. Then he tried to predict a planet between Mercury and the Sun, because the current Newtonian physics wasn't lining up to observations, a similar situation to how Neptune was found. Then Einstein's work on gravity modeled the orbital bodies more accurately, ending the debate if there was another planet closer to the sun than Mercury. Just a different food-for-thought point of view, as I don't know what the answer is obviously.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

Science and history are fun because we keep adding new information and proving / disproving theories.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The team acknowledges that other forces could be at play that might explain the behavior that they simulated but suggest they are less likely.

Space Whales

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

These comments.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
104 points (91.3% liked)

science

24263 readers
71 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS