205
submitted 6 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

STATEMENT FROM BESIEGED UCLA PALESTINE SOLIDARITY ENCAMPMENT: https://x.com/PplsCityCouncil/status/1785620846700351510

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago

I'm not usually one to invoke the founders, because they were a bunch of misogynist slave owners, but for fuck's sake, this country was literally founded on protesting!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Yes, but that was really not my point.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago

Zionist counter-protesters threatening protesters with violence to try to get a reaction so they can retaliate and play victim. Initiate violence anyway. Sounds familiar...

[-] Hobbes@startrek.website 46 points 6 months ago

The "counter-protestors" all wore black hoodies and white masks.

This was not a reaction to violence from the Gaza side. It was planned by the attackers.

So we've got people in favor of IDF being violent against peaceful protestors. I can't even begin with the irony of that.

We've also got police who were called immediately but did nothing to stop the violent attackers (some of those that work forces...).

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is really disappointing. The violence by the counter-protestors is:

  • morally wrong
  • terrible for publicity
  • pointless, since the police have been breaking up these protests anyway

Who did this and why?

[-] firadin@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Well the police didn't step in to stop the violence against the protestors, and the news outlets are all reporting this as "both sides" - so it sounds like the attackers got what they wanted.

[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

The news outlets I saw reporting on this were mostly calling out that violence was started by agitators rather than counter-protestors

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

The news outlets I saw reporting on this were mostly calling out that violence was started by agitators rather than counter-protestors

There's also "news outlets" that say Russia and China are utopias...

So maybe it would be best to show the sources that you think have proof that Israel supporters aren't attacking college students for protesting Israel's ongoing genocide of Palestinians.

[-] firadin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

[One way of reading the comment you replied to is that] the point is that the media is both-sides-ing this instead of truthfully reporting that the violence was directed against the protestors. This allows the protests to be portrayed as "radical" and feeds into the false "pro-terrorism" and "extremist" narrative being portrayed against Gazan and Palestinian sympathizers.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 6 months ago

The real headline (maybe LA Times changed it after this was posted):

UCLA cancels classes after counterprotesters violently attack pro-Palestinian camp

Snippets from the article:

Just before midnight, a large group of counterdemonstrators, wearing black outfits and white masks, arrived on campus and tried to tear down the barricades surrounding the encampment. Campers, some holding lumber and wearing goggles and helmets, rallied to defend the encampment’s perimeter.

A group of security guards could be seen observing the clashes but did not move in to stop them.

At around 1:40 a.m., police officers in riot gear arrived, and some counterprotesters began to leave. But the police did not immediately break up the clashes at the camp, which continued despite the law enforcement presence.

“It gives people impunity to come to our campus as a rampaging mob,” she said early Wednesday. “The word is out they can do this repeatedly and get away with it. I am ashamed of my university.”

I bet dollars to donuts there were fascists in that group who hate Jews but just wanted cover to go bash some Leftists.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In a statement Tuesday, UC President Michael V. Drake said he “fully” supported UCLA’s action. UC must be “as flexible as it can” in matters of free speech, he said, but must act in cases where student learning and expression are blocked, university functions disrupted and safety threatened.

The students are learning tho. You just don't like what they're learning, ie: how to protest, how to manage their own power base by protesting, etc etc.

I guess young people are only supposed to learn how to mold themselves into productive cogs for the machine.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago
[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Chuds being chuds.

[-] Sl00k@programming.dev 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Relevant videos if anyone wants to see the violence for themselves. Its an absolute joke that most US media sources are framing this as a "Clash" or "Violence erupts". This is an attack on peaceful protestors.

https://twitter.com/Esqueer_/status/1785637622582309038?s=19

https://twitter.com/ryangrim/status/1785622283161067568?s=19

https://twitter.com/TheKevinDalton/status/1785664176406642996?s=19

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Weird to think I went to UCLA for undergrad. I knew the type to participate in protests, though, and they do get pretty passionate. Back then, it was the dreamers act support and the level of extreme was mostly occupying a few very busy streets and ultimate just ruining people's day with terrible traffic.

But that was 2008 (I think) pre-TikTok and pretty early into social media. I think there are actors that stoke the fires on both sides with either misinformation and/or more persuasive material because so much more is recorded (e.g. most people get fired up when seeing video of people fucking dying). It's one thing to know people are dying, it's another to see first hand accounts.

For instance, in 2008 we were informed of fucked up things the US did in Iraq, but footage was scarce and the most we really had to get pissed off about were pictures of that one lady who posed prisoners in weird fucked up ways. If it was today, we'd have been given a lot more civilian death stats along with videos of people getting shot, bombed (plus again, lots of false info too). I'm pretty sure students would have been a lot more disruptive than just holding up traffic.

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
205 points (93.2% liked)

News

23360 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS