616
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hackitfast@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

Let's make this simple.

Elon for example is worth 180 billion. His private jet, which costs $17k/yr to refill, is worth $62 million, or 0.03% of his net worth.

The average person, maybe lower middle class to middle class, is let's say worth about $250,000. If they bought or leased a car worth $45k, that would be 18% of their net worth.

It is probably the equivalent, or LESS than the equivalent of someone in the middle class, buying a candy bar. And they can do it over and over again with no repercussions.

And jet fuel is incredibly pollutant, and billionaires pollute millions of more times in general than the average person.

https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/billionaire-emits-million-times-more-greenhouse-gases-average-person

I'm fully in support of these protesters and hope they don't stop.

[-] Echo71Niner@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

They are legends, they've painted super yachts, blocked private jets, and targeted golf courses to protest unnecessary emissions from the wealthy, which may as well be a paid-group by fossil fuel companies to divert attention from them being the biggest fucking problem.

[-] cloud@lazysoci.al 39 points 1 year ago

The wealthy answer will be to have these activists convicted for terrorism for invading an airport

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

The American way

[-] StringTheory@beehaw.org 20 points 1 year ago

Golf courses use huge amounts of water. Streams get diverted to water them. The countryside dries up without its water, and then catches fire. It’s not good.

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

They also waste an incredible amount of space, during a housing crisis.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

In southern Arizona they typically use reclaimed, non-potable water, at least. I wonder if they do that anywhere else?

[-] Letto@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Oftentimes they do not as it is quite expensive to make many kinds of "grey water" safe enough to be basically touched by golfers all the time. Being in the center of the desert with high water costs, it made sense in Arizona.

Regardless, keeping that much grass alive for such a small number of people to enjoy feels like a misalignment in priories of a local water authority to me. With the general trend towards water insecurities the world over I'm a bit upset with golf courses.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Roundcat@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Finally, we have caught up to the orcas in climate action.

[-] WilliamTheWicked@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Omg, finally..

If/when they get caught, this shit is a great use of jury nullification.

[-] iByteABit@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Fuck ther shit up until they gain a conscience

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Well I don't know if them gaining a conscience is realistic. But if doing the wrong thing becomes too costly and inconvenient they might stop doing those things. Well... they might do slightly less wrong things.

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

It'll be cheaper to remove those who make it expensive.

[-] prd@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

They won’t, and it’s pretty naive to think actions like this will cause them to grow a conscience.

Stunts like these are fun in a cathartic way, but not even a mild inconvenience or cost to them. It ultimately yields nothing.

[-] iByteABit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I don't, I was exaggerating.

I do think though that it's about time the general public stops being so passive about climate change among other things.

[-] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Golf, lol. How are they going to make sales and network? ( and get drunk and basically have the day off. )

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
616 points (99.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5183 readers
739 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS