177
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] woop_woop@lemmy.world 152 points 6 months ago

This doesn't feel like news worth anyone's time..

[-] Jordan117@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago

idk, I think it's worth stopping to recognize how incredibly fucking weird it is how there's this whole segment of the population who spend an inordinate amount of their time and attention just absolutely obsessing over their hatred of trans people. Rowling is the public face of it but she's hardly alone.

[-] brad_troika@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago

You're absolutely right, I'm just not sure why Elon Musk's opinion is what makes this news.

[-] Jordan117@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

Just goes to show how one-note she's gotten, that even the owner of the platform who's no SJW and desperate to ingratiate himself to celebs is like, "can you give it a rest already?"

I scrolled through her feed to see how long before that was her last non-trans-related tweet and gave up after two dozen.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Not just the owner of that platform, but the very vocally anti-trans owner of the platform.

It would be like David Duke telling Nick Fuentes to stop being so racist all the time.

[-] applebusch@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If the irrational hatred of gay people is similar at all, these people are closeted trans people inflicting their hatred of themselves and their own feelings on the world. Probably.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

I disagree. I think it's worth as much time as possible letting people know that they're reading books written by a bigot to their kids.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

I don't think most people actually care. And if it doesn't affect the reading of the book, why should they care?

My shelves are filled with authors that have questionable views. I own some books by Marquis de Sade and Yukio Mishima and those authors are extremely controversial. I own a copy of Being and Time and Heidegger is associated with Anti-Semitism and Nazism. Agatha Christie's novels are filled with casual orientalism and racism, and Houellebecq is criticized for being a sexist Islamophobe whose stories have far-right extremist views. My shelves are filled with pessimists and misanthropists and I'm quite sure many of them would share Rowling's views on transgender issues, but I have no plans to get rid of those books.

I understand why someone no longer wants to read Rowling and essentially cancels her, but at the same time I wonder if cancelling authors is any different from banning books. Should we stop reading books because their authors were not good people or is there a difference between deceased authors and modern authors who are alive to profit from booksales? Do you separate the book from the writer or is the author's personal life relevant to you?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Letting parents know gives them the choice and letting people know that someone is a bigot is not 'canceling' them.

[-] llamajester421@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago

Cancelling authors is not like banning books. Oppressing transgender voices is instead much like burning and banning books lists, Florida-style. People are very much aware that Martin Heidegger hailed the Nazis and they can read his work at their own risk. This is not the case with Rowling, who people think is reasonably skeptic towards a radical, dangerous idea. At least this is what Facebook, in contrast to Lemmy, would have you believe. If people are similarly aware that Rowling is a holocaust denier, an obsessive hatred monger in disagreement to all major scientific and medical bodies, an accolade of antisemitic conspiracy theories, and a supporter of trans genocide, then there might be a place for her on your fucking bookshelf. You know, when she is history, not a direct threat to democracy, human life and people's health care and well being.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Fr, celeb gossip section is thataway 👉

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 118 points 6 months ago

Here's a thought: let's collectively not give either of these idiots any more attention 🙄

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 60 points 6 months ago

The good thing about JK Rowling going mad on transgender stuff is that my wife will no longer request we watch any more godawful Fantastic Beasts movies.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

I watched the first one and thought it was bad but not that bad. I really should've stopped there. It's actually kind of impressive that such shitty writing can get that level of funding. I know that it's for kids, but have a little respect for your kids' intelligence, people!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago

Jesus Christ, she wrote a 700-word post about how trans women aren't women.

I realize she writes long books and I hate to agree with Elon but find another fucking subject.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Isn't one of Elon's kids transgender? I'm sure even the nazi bar owner is a bit concerned about his kid's safety at some point.

Edit after additional thought, my guess is Elon sees having a trans kid as a personal failure so the constant reminder probably tears up his incredibly fragile ego.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Isn't one of Elon's kids transgender

Yes and she disowned him pretty much the moment she turned 18.

He, having been extremely anti-trans ever since his ex left him for Chelsea Manning, would never defend his daughter or even stop misgendering her.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

And I've said for a while now that you have to be an exceptionally shitty father for your daughter to disown you despite you being one of the richest people on the planet.

[-] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

You have to be an exceptionally shitty person to be one of the richest people on the planet

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Agreed, but she went out of her way to let him know she did not want to be associated with him at all. She wanted it entered into court records. She also did it very soon after turning 18.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/21/business/elon-musk-child-files-to-change-name-gender/index.html

She could have just broken contact with him and hoped he'd still put her in his will, but he was such a complete douchebag of a father that she said, "fuck you and your billions."

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Absolutely! She gave up SO much material comfort and luxury to get away from him! He must be just as awful as a dad as he seems to be as a person online.

Good on her for getting away from that toxic man-child, though! Can't have been easy but is probably worth it!

[-] LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 6 months ago

Surprising, given the vitriol, misinformation Space Karen spews whenever possible on the X platform. It’s amazing her toxic rhetoric is the one which makes that makes Space Karen uneasy. 🫢

I guess even bigots have a line in the sand. 🙃

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Just LEAVE PEOPLE THE FUCK ALONE ABOUT THEIR CHOICES, ITS NOT THAT HARD.

I don't see why people have to do this. Just leave people alone.

[-] Germandaniel@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

We need to bring back the character limit

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

Is this a reprimand or an invitation to spew hate at other sections of society like him?

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

Agreed. This is more bullshit to keep us distracted. Don’t think any more of it and go do something you enjoy. (That goes for all of you!) :)

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
177 points (74.9% liked)

News

23409 readers
1851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS