317
submitted 6 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

For instructional purposes only:

I guess it got so bad that they moved the original form (archive link) to this new URL with a 2 at the end (live at the time of this post) and added some fields.

[-] BoneALisa@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I called in Mr. Harry Balls to make a complaint.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Glaad to hear it.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Ha, that was entertaining.

[-] MorganCS@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

I hate when they call people activists just for trying to do the right thing against a corrupt government

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

It's the correct term. The bad thing is that it apparently has a negative connotation.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

That is intentional. The same corporations that lobby the govt to pass legislation that let's them do whatever they want also lobby the govt to make protest and activism seem like a bad thing.

I mean just look at how people react to protestors gluing themselves to roads or handcuffing themselves to machines or whatever. They're almost universally seen as problem causers because all anyone else sees is someone wasting their time.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

The term activist has a good connotation with me, but there are certainly ones who take things too far and give others a bad name. Totally depends on what they're doing and why.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

See the problem falls on what is "too far"?

I'm personally at the point where I feel violence is necessary. Peaceful protest only works when the people your protesting against aren't using literal military forces against you.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

You're right, it's very subjective.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Doing the lord's work by smiting dumbass ideas

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 6 months ago

“It’s not surprising that activists are taking the time to send false reports,” Birkeland said. “But that isn’t a distraction from the importance of the legislation and the protection it provides women across Utah.”

This asshole thinks trans women aren't women. He can suck a fuck.

LGBTQ+ rights advocates also have warned the law and the accompanying tip line give people license to question anyone’s gender in community spaces, which they argue could even affect people who are not trans.

Their warnings were amplified earlier this year when a Utah school board member came under fire — and later lost her reelection bid — for publicly questioning the gender of a high school basketball player she wrongly assumed was transgender.

I remember reading about that shithead's comments. Glad to know she lost her job because of it.

[-] UltraBlack@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This asshole thinks trans women aren’t women. He can suck a fuck.

well trans men are gonna have a hard time using the stand-up-pisser. I guess trans women won't have that issue since women's restrooms offer no convenience-pissing solution for women but still.

I think you're getting a little too pumped up over this

[-] Nikki@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

because mens restrooms dont have sitting toilets

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago

The simple protest that will eventually end this is to smash urinals. Once businesses get fed up replacing them all bathrooms will become stall only. Then it truly doesn't matter which bathroom anyone goes into.

[-] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 6 months ago

A small cup of fast-setting plaster should suffice. Less effort, less noise.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

True, but bricks and rocks are easier to come by.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Truly genius. Have to love it.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
317 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1936 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS