Ah yes, the market. Known for it's agile flexibilty so that it can adjust to demand at will and efficiently. I'm sure this will turn out well for everyone. By which I mean the peasants will be forced to commute to keep the status quo or they'll lose their house while governments bail out the class that took on the risk for this real estate.
I think the cat's out of the bag at this point... There are and will be attempts to reverse the trend by sheer executive will, but it isn't going to be enough to save the overall commercial real estate market globally.
I don't know enough about how things are linked together, but I suspect that will have an impact on home prices as well when it happens
My cynical attitude says commercial real estate corporations will probably try to pivot to residential real estate and gouge us all when corporate real estate doesn't pan out.
TRY to pivot? They already have, that started years ago
I would love to see some hard data on this, but I wonder how much of the increase in corporate purchases of homes is driven by the need to prop up their flagging real estate investments.
The reason prices aren't dropping with lower demand is that all this shit belongs to hedgefonds, private equity firms and the like. Those fucks are usually leveraged to the hilt, i.e. they cannot cope with even a small correction. That's why they hold on to high rents at all costs and would rather see a huge increase in vacancies than a drop in rent. That can go on only for so long, until the pressure becomes too great and we'll have 2008 all over again.
Because their plan A of flooding the public discourse with stories about how we’ll all die if we don’t “return to office” has failed.
I know conversion of office space to apartments is not trivial (location and "bandwidth" of the building's infrastructure, etc.), but they are buildings that are designed to hold many people for many hours per day, and often occupy some of the best locations for transit and larger parking structures in a given city. At the very least this should result in more residential and mixed-use projects and fewer dedicated office buildings going forward.
From what I understand, you can convert a lot of buildings that were built before the middle of the century; it's the massive onees that are the issue. Older buildings were designed to let in light and air from the outside. If you break them into apartments, you can get something that's a reasonable size with windows.
But if you try to convert one of those massive square skyscrapers, you run into issues. You could break each floor into a set of massive apartments, but there aren't enough people who can afford them. You can make really long, thin apartments with windows at one end, but most people don't want to live in something that's 10-15 feet wide, a third of a city block long, with windows at one end. Or you can put the apartments around the edges and then do something with the center space; say, put tenant storage space every 3 floors, a gym every 8 floors, a play area every 5 floors, etc. But that raises the cost of the apartments and incurs monthly fees to clean and maintain those areas.
do something with the center space
A simple shared courtyard on most floors could be valuable, but yeah, it sounds like one of the biggest challenges is making attractive housing out of them. With real estate being somewhat non-fungible though, that becomes a pricing issue. People would live in the high-rise equivalent of a single-wide or container house for free. They wouldn't for 10 million bucks. Does the inflection point in-between match with the economics of doing the conversion? Every building and every city will have a different calculation.
And yes, there is a nagging sense of boring dystopia going through my brain in all this, though tempered by the sense that we shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the ~~good~~ safely and affordably housed. When do we force Hiro Protagonist to move into his storage unit?
If you made it a co-op with the condition that anyone who buys in early gets an apartment if they help with the refurbishment, you'd probably get a lot of offers.
They mostly wouldn't be able to do experienced (and more importantly union) contractor work like lay pipe and wire cables, but they could certainly do things like put down carpet and tile and paint walls with a small amount of instruction.
Some of the concerns I've seen are that while electrical should be fine for the type of stuff America uses 110v for, overkill even, the plumbing is all in the wrong places and likely inadequate for how many people will need showers and baths, the HVAC isn't really meant for the granularity people would want, and it would be a challenge to get the ventilation and heavy duty circuitry to every unit to safely allow for cooking.
What I do think they could do is convert to dormitory style housing with shared kitchens and baths, and while that limits your target audience, it limits it to the people most in need of affordable housing. Refurbing existing office blocks is certainly not a panacea, and I am already cringing at some government that thinks it would be, but I don't think we're too far off from denser cities considering it in some cases. I think the bigger opportunity is in new builds and more drastic redevelopments. With very few exceptions, I don't think any urban core needs to be building dedicated office buildings anymore. Seems it would be way easier and sufficiently cost effective to allow for conversion later even if it's not in the plan now.
But there are too many people with huge sums of money invested to allow a cataclysmic event to happen, and for swathes of cities to become ghost towns. [...] vacated commercial buildings are set to be updated, transforming areas formerly packed with office workers during workweeks, and nearly deserted over weekends, into "hybrid destinations" filled with greater green spaces, pedestrianised areas and leisure options that keep a more consistent weekly footfall. [...] Developers might be forced to the cliff edge to be creative, but they have around five years to prepare, mobilise and get ready for the future that's coming.
Lol, this guy imagining that they're going to spend their time accepting massive losses and making plans to convert their buildings, instead of spending massive amounts of time and money re-writing laws and codes so they don't get stuck with the losses.
I mean, I could see what he's saying if this was one city, or some percentage of cities. But this is every city, plus half the suburbs, all at the same time, all trying to offset the same trillions of dollars of losses.
TARPs, you say?
Yeah who would have though employees are unhappy in the hellscape of open Office plans and flexible workplaces. No silence, no privacy, no rest just a constant bussing of all the worker bees around that distract you with questions, loud phone conversations and anything else. But it is much cheaper for the employer so there is that.
No, you don't understand. Corporations need those open office hellscapes to leverage their protective synergies, to maximize their dynamic paradigms, and to fulfill various other nuggets of marketing buzzword bullshit.
Oh, and because they don't trust the worker bee employees as far as they can throw them, and because they need to keep the legion of mostly incompetent middle management busy so the C-level muckity-mucks can continue to stiff everyone who works for or uses the company to get fatter bonuses.
(Hmm, I think my cynicism escaped.)
Burn, baby. Burn.
The time spent to commute to work is much longer than the time it takes a hedgie to plummet from a window of their own free will.
Ha haaa
/push
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/