68
submitted 6 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pheta@fedia.io 14 points 6 months ago

man, some of those comments really got under my skin.

Like, they were so insensitive to the issue and dismissive it was honestly pretty alarming. Like they couldn't understand why you can't just go and buy a copy of an unpopular NES game, or why academic study is even a good thing. Like, these are the illiterate, inbred stereotypes that resent having to do book reports because 'they don't read good'. It'd be comical if it wasn't alarming.

[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

I'm trying to research how fun this game is, plz halp!

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 6 months ago

The games industry already uses people with psychology degrees to come up with ways of tricking your brain into wanting more or other ways of manipulation to coax you into certain paths in the game; how can they not see the value of more research on games that may lead to more bullshit like that? 🤷🏻‍♂️

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

There's an easy solution... make everything before the 2000s public domain.

Suck it, Nintendo.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8551 readers
458 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS