59
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] czech@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Some employees have also been pushing the company to supply data that support Jassy’s claims. During the session, Jassy said the company’s leadership looked at the data it has available and among other things, he said they didn’t feel that meetings were as effective from home as they were before. He added there are a lot of scenarios where the company has made some of its biggest decisions without perfect data

In other words: he has no actual data to support a return from WFH but has a lot of feelings.

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 year ago

All the data I’ve seen used to justify RTO policies has involved difficulties onboarding new employees. It is harder to instill a work culture in people who you aren’t around in-person. It’s harder to learn all the miscellaneous things that you take for granted after having been at a place for a year.

But even that data didn’t account for companies attempting to solve that problem. And honestly, it’s not that complicated:

  1. Make it easy for a person to discover the information they need.
  2. Ensure teams are given tools (and a means to quickly procure needed tools) to collaborate and given time to socialize, document their internal knowledge, and that the expectation of doing those things is communicated.
  3. Don’t exempt people working in person from these expectations.

I worked remotely at a company where my team was entirely remote. Even after ownership changed and they mandated RTO, every member of the team was in a different location, so we had to keep working as though everyone was remote. This meant making time to socialize, making sure we had team documentation that was easy to access and easy to understand, time set aside to work in groups remotely, collaboration tools that we actually used, and a reasonable budget for WFH supplies (headphones, microphones, keyboards, monitors, even a desk/chair - heck, I could have gotten a Wacom tablet to use in whiteboarding sessions if I hadn’t had one already). Even when everyone on the team except for me was laid off, I was able to direct the new people responsible to the various places where system and process knowledge was documented.

I can’t name a single thing that would have been easier to resolve in-person. The only exception I can even think of would have been a complete hardware failure with my company laptop, since then I would have been unable to work until a replacement arrived, but no company should contract with a hardware vendor whose failure rates are high enough for that to be a factor.

Try explaining that to a group of execs who haven’t been individual contributors their entire adult lives, though.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Wait! That would require actually training new hires and would be expensive! Upper Management prefers to make existing employees do it for free as an additional task that was never on the job description.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Truthiness.

[-] absentthereaper@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I ache for a return to the days when laborers kicked in the doors of their bosses over shit like this.

[-] elevenfingerfrk@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

How are managers going to find staff to have sex with if they can’t corner them in the office and abuse their power? WFH ruins the only means they have for ever getting laid.

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
59 points (91.5% liked)

News

23268 readers
2065 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS