239
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Biden administration has approved funding for the first-ever transfer of US military equipment to Taiwan under a program typically saved for sovereign nations, according to a notification sent to Congress on Tuesday.

The package – which is part of the State Department’s foreign military financing (FMF) program – totals $80 million and will be paid for by US taxpayers.

“FMF will be used to strengthen Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities through joint and combined defense capability and enhanced maritime domain awareness and maritime security capability,” the department wrote in its notification to Congress that was reviewed by CNN.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] giddy@aussie.zone 67 points 1 year ago
[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

De facto, yes.

But Taiwan themselves have never formally declared independence.

Taiwan is not a member of the UN, for example, and they have not applied.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago
[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That is not the same as being a member state. Taiwan is not a member.

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/member-states

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

back after 5 days...

They were a founding member of the UN.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Correct. The ROC was a founding member of the UN.

And they are not a member today. The PRC occupies that seat.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

So we agree.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

They don't need to declare independence from anything... Does the US need to declare independence from Portugal? They were never part of Portugal...

Also, the UN does not have anything to do with being a sovereign nation. It just determines, well, if you're a member of the UN.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On the anarchist planet that we live on, the UN actually does determine what is and isn't a sovereign nation. Otherwise its just up to personal belief.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I don't think that a good parallel. The US did issue a formal declaration of independence, clearly communicated it to the whole world, and defended it successfully.

The situation with Taiwan is much more ambiguous, as I don't think independence has been the goal. It's more a civil war that never really ended, and the US giving weapons to one side clearly disturbs the status quo. Of course China is also constantly looking to disturb it in their favor, so all of it is a very delicate balancing act...

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US issued a declaration of Independence... from Britain. Not Portugal.

Taiwan == ROC. The ROC was the original government of China. China == PRC. ROC has never in history been a part of PRC. There is as much reason for them to declare independence from PRC as there is for the US to declare independence from Portugal.

PRC are the ones who broke away from ROC, so they are the ones to declare independence.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There is as much reason for them to declare independence from PRC as there is for the US to declare independence from Portugal.

You just chose to ignore the fact that the PRC claims Taiwan as their territory, while Portugal makes no such claim over the US.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I claim France as my territory. Why has France not declared independence?

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I'll help you get there. Do you have an army of 2 million men, and spend 300 billion dollars a year on weapons?

Because the PRC does, and they do claim ROC as theirs.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Good! Taiwan is a sovereign nation.

[-] Fox@pawb.social 39 points 1 year ago

"We typically feed this type of food to cats", they said as they fed cat food to the cat

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess it's time for china to issue yet another Final Warning!!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

$80 million is not very much when it comes to military aid. We've spent billions on Ukraine.

[-] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

I'm confident that if China did decide to invade the amount of aid would ramp up exponentially. You can't expect to come anywhere near as close to what we have given Ukraine since they're not in the middle of an invasion.

[-] ElegantBiscuit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Not to mention that everything Ukraine has been asking for from the US, Taiwan already bought in numbers and has had in the country years ago. Patriot, F16, ATACMS, and the list extends below to HIMARS and artillery and Abrahams, and above to apaches, black hawks, Phalanx, a wide range of torpedos and ground and air launched missiles, and even entire submarines.

China would also have to attack across the Taiwan straight, and amphibious landings are insanely difficult to pull off for anyone let alone for the PLA which hasn’t actually had meaningful combat experience since the Vietnam war - their Vietnam war in 1979. Any military buildup would also be obviously spotted months in advance, meaning anything from propositioned US carrier strike groups, all the way to enough time for Taiwan to build a dirty bomb or small nuke if they felt like they needed the ultimate deterrent.

[-] giddy@aussie.zone 16 points 1 year ago

The money spent in Ukraine is money well spent. They have hugely damaged a major belligerent power, forever destroyed the myth of Russian strength, unified Europe and NATO and learned much about Russian military capabilities all while using last generation western hardware

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's also not just cash, most of the money is from arms we had basically laying around. It's not like we wrote them a check and handed it over.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely. I'm not saying it shouldn't have been spent. I'm saying this is a drop in the bucket in comparison before anyone gets worked up about it.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Forever destroyed the myth of Russian strength? That's funny. If that were going to happen, it'd have happened after the Winter War. Or maybe the Russo-Japanese War.

In a world where people don't all learn the same things, a myth of military strength is very easy to build from nothing. Just takes some consistent propaganda over time.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 8 points 1 year ago

Let's hope Winnie the Poo doesn't throw a tantrum.

[-] Hexagon@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Who had China-Taiwan war on their 2023 bingo card ?

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Like everyone?

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
239 points (98.0% liked)

News

23397 readers
1681 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS