103
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vatlark@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Does anyone else think the thumbnail looks like a llama with laser eyes?

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 17 points 8 months ago
[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That killllls peeeeople

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago

Earth-8311 version of Cyclops.

[-] Clandestine@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 months ago

I didn't see it by myself but now I can't unsee it

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago
[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 5 points 8 months ago

Can't unsee

[-] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’d just like to make the point that that is not normal.

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago

Well, the ship was towed outside of the environment.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] ghostblackout@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Bruh its a TEST STAND TEST STAND this is not the Frist time a engine exploded on a test stand raptor engines in their development phase are supposed to explode. Elon musk has said if something doesn't explode then you did something wrong

[-] kryptonite@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Well, if Musk said it, it must be true. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rImITywR@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the explosion, which took place at its Boca Chica Starbase facilities

The raptor testing stand at McGregor experienced an anomaly

Well, which is it? I'm going to trust NASASpaceflight over this article and go with it was a McGregor. No where near Starbase. And that means it will likely have no effect on IFT4 as this article says.

edit: Adding to this, the author of this article has no idea what they are talking about.

The Raptor engines that are currently undergoing testing are SpaceX’s Raptor 2 engines

So clearly nothing to do with IFT4, as Ship 29 and Booster 11 are already outfitted with their engines, non of which are Raptor 2s.

On its last flight test, IFT-3, Starship finally reached orbital velocity and it soared around Earth before crashing down into the Indian Ocean. On the next flight, SpaceX aims to perform a reentry burn, allowing Starship to perform a soft landing in the ocean.

IFT3 burned up on reentry, maybe parts of it made it to the ocean, but it was not crashing into the ocean that was the problem. IFT4 does not plan on doing a reentry burn. No one does a reentry burn from orbit. Starship uses a heat shield like every other orbital space craft. They are planning to attempt a landing burn, that is probably what they are talking about.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

It waw McGregor. And while the explosion was spectacular, it happened on the test stand, so not much damage was done actually.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 17 points 8 months ago

Hope everyone was okay, the article doesn’t talk about injuries.

Personnel are evacuated from McGregor whenever a test is to be performed, just like they are with Starbase.

There is absolutely zero chance anyone got hurt. This isn't Boeing.

[-] Manzas@lemdro.id 7 points 8 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Good lord, everyone please learn a tiny bit about spacex and the state of the space industry instead of letting your (justified) hatred of Elon do the typing.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I’d have a lot more sympathy for this comment if people would actually do this in reference to Space Billionaires. I’ve had far too many conversations online and elsewhere where the individual shits on NASA for space industry problems and worships Space Billionaires because [some convoluted “government bad rich entrepreneurs good” reason] and their problems aren’t really problems. I’m not saying you’re part of the billionaire sycophant club, but I’m not against musk’s well deserved criticism as he sacrifices people in his rush, and probably work quality suffers alongside them.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
103 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

61433 readers
1160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS