61

Why can't it be something fun like swapping surnames and then creating a portmaneau or blended name for the kids.

(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Why not fuck the patriarchy by refusing marriage altogether? Who the hell needs the state to bind you together?

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago
[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

tax evasion is only affordable for the rich

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Red_Sunshine_Over_Florida@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My platonic ideal of a Blarite politician is a lady with three hyphenated names that are just different regional variants of that name. Like Elizabeth Smith-Smythe-Schmidt or something.

[-] replaceable@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

My proposition: couples dont change surnames on marriage but children have surnames that are just first names of their parents

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Hello, my name is James Eliseson Tamarason Cesarson Tomson Dimitrison Josephson Sophieson Antonson Holden.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I love this for you Holden

[-] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (1 replies)

Changing your name can be a bitch. I know people with dual citizenship for whom it's even worse. Obviously the solution is to make it easier but advising women to not change their names in places where doing so is difficult is good advice.

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

As the nuclear family withers away and is replaced by more social relationships and parenting, I imagine keeping one's surname will become more common just out of practicality.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

what if instead of Michael Keaton, it was Michael Penis.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Michael Beanis, even.

[-] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

I actually have a somewhat serious question about this. I know a guy who had a really bland and boring surname so when he got married he took his wife's name. The thing is, she's from an ethnic minority and he is not. Am I wrong to think it's weird for a white person to change their name to a minority one but not the other way around? A Huang changing their name to Smith feels normal but a Smith changing their name to Huang just feels appropriationy.

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

wow.. uhh... "normal" is something you might want to examine there

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] peppersky@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Just abolish surnames altogether. No reason to have them

[-] Ishmael@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Go full Prince and just become a symbol.

Sincerely,

The Poster Formerly Known As Ishmael

[-] Babs@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

When I changed my name I decided not to have a middle name cause they're kinda dumb and my parents didn't have them either.. I'll probably put my maiden name there if I get married.

No middle name is the best aesthetic, I should get rid of mine one day too

[-] CthulhusIntern@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

There should be some game played in which the winner decides who keeps the surname. They can decide what game is played.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Our last name should be an assigned number counting from the first ever human to you.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13918 readers
683 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS