223
I've never met a teenager traumatized by porn. Admittedly, I don't ask teenagers about their porn habits either. But, I'm pretty sure people seeking out porn aren't going to be ruined by it.
The most harmful aspect is the unrealistic expectations it can set. In general, sex in porn is nothing like real life sex between two folks in love.
But that can be solved by decent sex education.
I have had porn sex before. It can be a fun twist when you're sensory seeking and fucking 3 times a day cause everything else in the relationship is shit.
I’ve never met a teenager traumatized by porn.
2girls1cup: "am I a joke to you?"
Don't know that I'd call that porn.
Not with that attitude.
I'm fine with that in this case.
(:
As an adult, I can look back and say I wish I hadn't seen the type and amount of porn I saw as a preteen/teen. And today's standard porn can be insanely aggressive; this has an affect. I have nothing against porn in general, but I also understand the concern.
Maybe so, but that's not what this is about. It's just another way to further erode privacy. You can monitor children's online activity and restrict it. It's as simple as that.
the only way I could see that being really traumatic is if it's their parents... and they didn't know their mom was a pornstar or something.
You’d think that Texas, a state known for their love of the 2nd amendment, would have at least read the rest of it up to that point.
Have you seen Texas recently? I'm tempted to start a petition to give it back to Mexico.
I'm pretty sure at this point, they'd go to war to make us keep it.
You're assuming they ever read even the 2nd amendment. They just listen to what some pundit on Fox tells them it says.
Damn! That judge really took them down point by point!
I wonder how different this ruling would have looked if it was in front of the usual Texas judge pool.
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
223 points (97.4% liked)
News
23259 readers
1601 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS