346
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net

Edit:

This is not intended as "how to grow all your food you ever need at home".

It merely provides the vegetables.

You still have to get your grains (and therefore the majority of your calories) from somewhere else.

geteilt von: https://lemmy.ca/post/22193783

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] andrewth09@lemmy.world 78 points 5 months ago

That's a big 0.1 acre lot.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 32 points 5 months ago

Or it's a 20 x 20 house.

[-] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Comes out to 4350 sq ft, vs 40,000 for an acre. So, a tiny bit more than 0.1 acres, but not quite 0.11.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Two room and a bathrood house, and shed.Nor garage, or drive way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

Shit like this looks cool, but most people don't have even a tenth of the time needed to maintain it...

[-] And009@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 5 months ago

It's common in India to provide a quarter and salary to rural people for help with maintaining such a place. They usually have experience with farming and happy to live without worrying about wages, food and a roof.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

In the US, that's called "rich", normal people can't afford servants here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] avguser@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That is not enough food to sustain a person, but a great way to cut down on grocery needs!

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 28 points 5 months ago

Is it efficient land use, though?

Keep in mind, we have to be able to feed 10 billion people. Homesteads like this are of course better than just plain grass, but compared to a farm, the output per area is probably really low. So there's still land being "wasted".

[-] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 20 points 5 months ago

You can’t compare this sort of thing to actual farming though, because that’s not the point of it at all. The point is supplementing from other sources like farms, reducing the need for intensive agriculture, and potentially (with enough people shifting to home gardening) reduce the size of farms needed for veg growing, freeing that space for other things.

It doesn’t have to be as efficient as a big farm to be good for the people consuming it as well as the environment (grass is worthless and veg have to be shipped if not grown locally)

We can’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 months ago

Homesteads like this are of course better than just plain grass, but compared to a farm, the output per area is probably really low.

I would've thought that as well, but, at least according to some studies referenced by the Edinicity project, small urban farming apparently results in significantly higher yields compared to industrial farming. If the figures referenced are correct, then it would seem small urban farming could be quite viable as a source of food for significant amounts of people.

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

I think the idea is that is an alternative to lawns, patios, driveways etc on already residential land, not a replacement for crops on already agricultural land. In fact, if all farmland was replaced with plots like this I don't think there would be enough people on the planet to live on them!

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 months ago

In exchange, the vegetables are really fresh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You might be able to survive if you grow just potatoes in those 8 beds and feed the 6 laying hens on weeds and scraps from the other plants.

You can also convert 3, the "tea herbs," into more potato beds.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 13 points 5 months ago

Potatoes are great from an energy input position, but if you were doing this without potatoes and your neighbor was doing just potatoes, I think that might be enough for both.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cipher22@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Literally explains that this is insufficient.

[-] toaster@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 months ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of the good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yuri@pawb.social 24 points 5 months ago

I feel like the beekeeping is wasted effort if you’re going for self-sufficience.

It’d be like including a space for a liquor still. Super neat in concept, enormous effort in practice. Hell I’d be more in favor of the still over the beehives honestly, way more utility.

[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

Don't forget that wax is super useful in a self-sufficient setup for prolonging the life of leather and wooden items. I've even used to protect my bike chain!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] The_v@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

That looks like a 1940's WII landscaping plan. If you really want to invest in homesteading, get out of the 1940's design.

Invest in a high tunnel instead. The larger the better.

It will out-produce the little raised beds by a factor of 3x to 10x depending on the crop.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

At first I thought that you were talking about growing vertically, but you probably meant something like a green house? Beyond extending the growing season, what else do they do to increase yeilds?

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Heat is what everyone thinks of, however that's only part of the equation.

More importantly they maintain higher air moisture level around the leaves close to the saturation point.

This allows the plants to keep their stomatas open longer. This keeps the photosynthetic pathways operating for more time during the day. More time = more carbohydrate = more production.

They are also usually watered by drip irrigation as well. Providing he right amount of water, not too much or too little, greatly increases a plants yield.

A high tunnel is a unheated/cooled greenhouse/nethouse that is popular in every country not stuck in the dark ages with their agriculture. They come in many sizes. For example 100m x 20m ones popular in the middle east and Australia. In southern Spain they built ones that cover 20ha or more. A few in Poland were my favorite. They used split pine rails to build them.

[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the reply. I can see this being a great way to go for a dedicated farm, which this post is proporting to do, but I am not sure I would want a high tunnel in my yard. I am on the wild-yard side of things and have wildflowers planted along one edge of my property, a milkweed garden, etc. I like to be able to see things growing and am not sure how I would feel about the visual block. I guess you could make one with more long-term transparent sides, but that would cost more $$.

As it is, we often have too large of yeilds when our four 4x8 raised beds really get going. Our issue isn't yeilds, it's the narrow width of peek yeild along with a combination of what we grow (not shelf stable) and storage systems (the whole pick early, store so it won't ripen, and ripen on demand system).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

There are loads of fantastic personal benefits to living like this, like having choice of fruit and vegetables that aren't possible to find in supermarkets, no plastic residues from packaging on your food (and no plastic waste to dispose of), getting exercise, fresh air and vitamin D from working in the garden, less carrying groceries around, less need for refrigeration (many veg goes straight from garden to kitchen), health benefits of contact with soil and seasonal diet just to list the first ones that come to mind. Also if your children have contact with animals (even hair and dust left behind by animals) they are less likely to developed allergies. And you're also not helping already wealthy shareholders of food corporations to further out-compete working class people in the market.

It's an absolute winner.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

Thanks, I thought the same thing.

Especially the "getting some physical exercise, and reconnecting with the soil" seem interesting upsides to me. We would all need some more of that in today's time it seems.

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I grew Chard one Summer during the pandemic. I had some old garden magazine with a similar sketch, but focusing on the vegetable beds. They described how incredibly space efficient chard is, and how it should be grown in any garden centered on self-sufficiency.

So anyways, I'm all for community gardening now and can not look at another leaf of chard for the next decade. That stuff really knocks the dream of self-sufficiency out of any gardener. It's ridiculous how much Chard just 2 rows of plants can produce with minimal time spend tending to them, but don't believe anyone who says its leaves tastes like spinach and the stems like asparagus. It tastes like green mush and is best chucked in the freezer to die a slow death, maybe to be micro-dosed into some smoothie.

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I should have instead started with Chickens, maybe they would have liked it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

This is a nice sentiment, but not really to scale unless that's a kids play house.

[-] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If this is 1/10 of an acre, then TIL one acre is really big

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

1 acre ~ 4000 m²

You need approx. 1200 m² to feed a person, so 1 acre was approx. a small-sized family farm back in the day.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 12 points 5 months ago

For those civilized in the ISO metric, 87' x 50' would be around 26.1m x 15m = 391.5m²

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 5 months ago

Living on .66 acres, this seems wholly unachievable for most people. In a perfect world, it's neat, but just not very realistic in most cases.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

That house seems to be ~450 sq ft, that seem right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

1 acre = 43,560 sq ft

43,560 sq ft / 10 = 4356 sq ft

8 ft x 4 ft x 8 = 256 sq ft if you bunch all the beds up together

Honestly it's entire lot size is slightly larger than an average USA home family floorplan, but you're not gonna have any privacy and you're not going to feed the people more than once in a blue moon on that amount of homegrown.

And you want to live with BEES in that amount of space? Yeah, have fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aermis@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

My home is on a 9k lot. Almost twice the size of this but I can't fit anything near that. I guess majority of my space is take up by the front lawn and driveway.

[-] MagicPterodactyl@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago

Your house is also probably a lot bigger than what's pictured.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

Am I blind, or is number 4 missing?

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

It’s missing on purpose. There is not enough room for grains.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 months ago

Growing enough grain to feed yourself takes 400 - 1000 m² depending on soil fertility.

So you can't do that in your backyard. It's also dramatically more efficient to harvest grains with big machinery, so it's wise to put it together with your neighbours and form something like a cooperative.

[-] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

That's like a 32m x 32m field, not as big as I was expecting. But yes, larger fields are more efficient. I wonder if there is some reasonable setup for farming grains with aquaponics. (Rice doesn't count XD)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

That house is absolutely not to scale

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I just put in a garden with 4 8x4 beds. Sounds like I need another 4 beds. This shit is addicting.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
346 points (93.2% liked)

Solarpunk

5393 readers
53 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS