271
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 83 points 5 months ago

I wrote my undergraduate dissertation on this topic: Investigating the influences on 17th C. Spanish Art depicting visions and religious experiences.

Have been asked by the mods to post the dissertation separately from the artwork so happy to oblige -

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11_Os0A5Ngwx0R8BwPIA2cqa_m3kg56lW/view?usp=sharing

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Thanks for contributing both to this community and to the academic study of art.

Beautiful selection to highlight on your post.

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Thanks! It was fun to write at the time. I was doing a double major of History of Art and Philosophy but the HoA was definitely inflating my grade average!

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

What if this was the equivalent of like a 17th century shit post?

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Cano did a good job of convincing the church he was being sincere! Probably would have been excommunicated or executed if they suspected him of herasy.

Edit: he personally described his work as being "edifying" lol

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

We've always been weird, huh?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Sexual repression’s a helluva drug

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They were definitely geeking out on something! I had this piece of visionary poetry in my dissertation:

I entered - where - I did not know,

Yet when I found that I was there,

Though where I was I did not know,

Profound and subtle things I learned;

Nor can I say what I discerned,

For I remained uncomprehending,

All knowledge transcending.

  • John of the Cross, Verses Written on an Ecstasy.

NB "ecstasy" as we know it did not exist in the 16th Century 😂

[-] shani66@ani.social 8 points 5 months ago

Iirc ecstasy originally meant being fucked up. Blackout drunk or so high you aren't present anymore, so it checks out

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I think it refers to a state of religious fervor here. Like people speaking in tongues in modern day evangelical churches.

In terms of drugs they have been used throughout history but in this era it would need to be mushrooms or potentially in a highly rare cases ergot affecting communal grain supplies. Should emphasise that there is no evidence whatsoever that these writers/artists were using psychoactive substances.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

There's neuropsychology studies on states of religious ecstasy and euphoria. The theory is that essentially the brain fucks itself up on an excess of dopamine and our own endogenic version of DMT. Certain religious sects actually train for and aim at producing such states. Fasting, meditation and music are facilitators of the state, and it is not casual that all three are part of most religious practices.

[-] Dreyns@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Hey my man gotta explain the white stains on his shirt to the church !

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

.....painting did it.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

She has a very good aim. Was that one of her miracles?

[-] DABDA@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago
[-] neuroneiro@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The most underrated movie ever.

[-] DABDA@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I can't remember if I stumbled across it at a video store or caught it on cable or something, but even though I was a KitH fan I had no idea they were making a movie. Absolutely love it though and even with familiar elements and some returning characters it didn't feel like just a rehash of the show. I was bummed to learn (from the 2022 "Comedy Punks" documentary) that they were totally miserable making it and there was bad blood between Dave and everyone else.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago

Curious what the christ - child's face looks like in this situation.

I'm imagining something like:

[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

how does this baby look like its 50?

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Apropos since 17th century babies looked like tiny adults from what we can tell from paintings from the time at least.

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

This is why Art History is entertaining.

[-] Magnetar@feddit.de 16 points 5 months ago

I kind of want to fit a parabola to that stream of milk to check if the physics is correct.

[-] match@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago

i think it's miraculous laminar flow

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago
[-] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Well i didnt knew that . I thought that this kink was pretty recent.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 19 points 5 months ago

Check out some ancient pottery, bath walls, and a lot of art to see that most sex acts and kinks have been round for millenia.

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Rule 34 was really just copypasta to start with.

[-] petersr@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

What velocity does the milk exit the nipple with to be able to have that trajectory?

[-] petersr@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

From ChatGPT:

Me: Water exits a nozzle at coordinate (0, 1.7m) and hits the ground at (2m, 0). Assume the water exits the nozzle at 90 degree (i.e. straight to the right). How can we determine the speed of the water?

(here I made some rough assumptions based on the image, and assumed that her feet were at (0, 0)

Answer: The speed of the water exiting the nozzle can be determined using the principles of projectile motion.

  1. Determine the time of flight:

    The water is projected horizontally from a height of 1.7 meters and hits the ground at 2 meters horizontally. The vertical motion is governed by the equation: [ y = y_0 + v_{y0} t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2 ] Here, ( y_0 = 1.7 ) meters, ( v_{y0} = 0 ) m/s (since there is no initial vertical velocity), and ( g = 9.8 ) m/s² (acceleration due to gravity).

    The water hits the ground when ( y = 0 ): [ 0 = 1.7 - \frac{1}{2} \times 9.8 \times t^2 ] Solving for ( t ): [ 1.7 = 4.9 t^2 ] [ t^2 = \frac{1.7}{4.9} ] [ t = \sqrt{\frac{1.7}{4.9}} \approx 0.59 \text{ seconds} ]

  2. Determine the horizontal velocity:

    The horizontal distance covered is 2 meters. Since horizontal velocity ( v_x ) is constant (there is no horizontal acceleration), the distance can be given by: [ x = v_x t ] Here, ( x = 2 ) meters and ( t \approx 0.59 ) seconds: [ v_x = \frac{2}{0.59} \approx 3.39 \text{ m/s} ]

Therefore, the speed of the water exiting the nozzle is approximately 3.39 m/s.

[-] Spendrill@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Get 'im, Mum!
Ahaha, right in the mooey!

[-] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Cheeky Mary

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
271 points (97.2% liked)

Traditional Art

4453 readers
108 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS