327
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] edwardbear@lemmy.world 129 points 5 months ago

Oh, if they PROMISE.

Fuck Adobe. I’ll pirate PS and AI until I die. Greedy fucking pigboys.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 85 points 5 months ago

Pirating Adobe software is exactly what they want you to do. Their business model relies on businesses paying for their license because people already know how to use their software, in large part because people pirate it, and also they have deals with schools to teach their software.

What Adobe actually doesn't want you to do is to learn the software of their competition, since that's how they will lose money in the long term.

[-] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 31 points 5 months ago

This. Right here.

The main reason we need to push for open source alternatives is this. The more people learn how to use them the more content around them we get and more people take interest in using it and helping develop it (and donate to it).

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I went to Affinity Photo and Illustrator years ago, and I’m a fan. One time purchase, easy to use, and full tutorials from the creators on Vimeo. ~~Only downside is that it’s only available on Apple devices.~~ Turns out it’s available on Windows now too.

https://affinity.serif.com

[-] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

And it's a huge downside. Meanwhile open source apps are usually available on every platform, with no purchase required.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I hear you. I used to use GIMP before I paid for PS. I bailed when Adobe went subscription, and figured I’d try Affinity for $10. It’s worth every penny. I’d get behind an open source alternative again if it met my needs.

[-] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

I can understand it, I almost paid for Davinci Resolve Studio due to it still being the most complete video editor that works on Linux, most of the time closed source apps function better (specially due to the biggest funding), but still, using open source whenever you can basically prevents this from ever happening (specially after Canva bought Affinity, I'd keep an eye out for the eventual enshittification)

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Affinity is also on Windows - at least Designer is. I've been using it for a couple of years now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago

Is there an open source PDF editor? I would really love anything other than acrobat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

That 15 yr old cracked CS5 I have on an old hard drive is looking mighty scrumptious right now.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Those are the easiest apps to replace. I'll just use Gimp and Inkscape until I die. Not even tempted by Adobe's bloat, spyware, etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 77 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Every time we trusted a large tech promise on an unverifiable claim, they ended up shafting us. Just sayin'.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

"We promise"

Source: Trust me, bro

[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 62 points 5 months ago

Guys, seriously. The entire Affinity Suite is $150. Paid for updates through the current version. It's solid.

Dump Adobe.

[-] zbb@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 months ago

Being recently acquired by Canva stops me from trusting that deal in the long run.

[-] joojmachine@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago

even better, use the money you'd pay for adobe suite and donate to open source alternatives

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I'm going to give Krita a try for some of the photobashing sort of stuff I do

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] makyo@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I'm on their site now and the full suite is on sale - €90, not sure if that's the same for everyone's local schnorples.

[-] zbb@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Please reconsider.

Since Affinity have been recently acquired by Canva, many of its users doubt that perpetual license will be respected.

Just look at the comments of its announcement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Nice! I got it right after the latest version came out but that's been a while. They do sales pretty regularly though. It's definitely not as massive as Adobe wrt features, but they cover the essentials well.

[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Would love to, but they are neglecting Linux Support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

It's 50% off right now.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago
[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Thats outdated. Only version 1 ran on bottles, and quite poorly. V2 is busted

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

claims that the company often uses machine learning to review user projects for signs of illegal content

OK, so what happens when Florida starts deciding more content is illegal?

Literally big brother shit.

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 months ago

This is what Tumblr did too after they banned porn. It couldn't tell the difference between the Sahara Desert and boobs.

[-] HonorableScythe@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Exactly my thoughts. Adobe is not the police and they should not be the ones trying to deter crime by any definition. How many horrible things have governments done to "protect the children"?

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

I'm betting the reason they want access to "moderate" your projects is to train their AI. Literally looking to steal artists work before it's out the door.

[-] ytsedude@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

That's absolutely what's going on.

A fun way to combat this would be to get every artist to add giant, throbbing dicks to everything they create in Photoshop with the hope that it creates the thirstiest, nastiest AI model out there.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Not just dicks, but dicks mixed with other art so it just completely pollutes the training data and the AI has no idea how to draw anything without it kind of looking like a dick. Dicks with human and animal faces, boats shaped like dicks, dick buildings and landscapes etc.

It would take an immense amount of bad data to actually work, but it would be funny.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Here's a License change which implies we're datafarming all your assets.

Here's my word that we're absolutely not goijf to be doing that. Trust me bro.

[-] doctortofu@reddthat.com 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Riiiight. And, pray tell Adobe, why in the everloving fuck woul you ever need to "review" private content that's not posted anywhere? Stop acting like you're the goddamned pre-crime agency from Minority Report and keep your dirty paws off stuff people are creating privately.

You are providing tools, and that's it. I can do horrible, illegal shit with my drill, but it doesn't give Black&Decker any right to break into my house to do random checks and see if I'm drilling through kneecaps instead of wooden planks...

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 5 months ago

Dear Adobe:

I. Don't. Believe. You.

regards,

Me. And probably your entire end-user base.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

Because when someone presents you a lengthy document. One that describes all the ways they claim ownership of your work (and work in progress) - in detail - it only matters how much they really mean what's written down? Let me spare you the sarcasm and just say this doesn't communicate the professionalism professionals are demanding. Quite the opposite.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 19 points 5 months ago

adobes promises are meaningless. you are now their product

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Interesting, we get to either hate them for going full big brother, or hate them for going full adobe in the first place. It's nice to have a choice sometimes.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

But did they super duper pinky promise, cross their heart, hope to die, poke a needle in their eye??

[-] capital@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“Adobe does not train Firefly Gen AI models on customer content. Firefly generative AI models are trained on a dataset of licensed content, such as Adobe Stock, and public domain content where copyright has expired.”

This references a single particular product. lol. If they're training a model by a different name with customer data, it would still be a true statement.

The points about lawyers and NDA's hit the nail on the head. I thought something similar with the Windows Recall debacle. That's a juicy set of data for anyone looking to find journalist sources or scrape a hospital's network. In every case it relies on the end user (business or individual) to know how to disable those features with GPOs/registry options... There's no way 100% of them realize the issue and have the knowledge to fix it.

[-] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 12 points 5 months ago

Well, let's have the adobe track record speak for itself...

[-] Quill0@lemmy.digitalfall.net 10 points 5 months ago

Bullshit

I have a sub. I download their app. And the they have the gall to install anti piracy software?

[-] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

But "big brother" would mean they watch you.

I read everywhere that they claim the rights to your projects, which is far worse than just watching over your shoulder innit?

[-] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago

Where did you read that? I can bet it wasn't the TOS, because that's not in there. The TOS allows Adobe to review anything you create with its products using manual or automated means, and maybe restricted to normal screening for CSAM and such (although it's really ambiguous about what they'll actually do with it).

[-] palordrolap@kbin.run 8 points 5 months ago

Big Brother? No. Not yet anyway.

Abusive in other ways? Let Uncle Louis tell you all about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXxMCm941WA

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

“We obviously have tight security around any form of access to customers content.”

https://scotthelme.co.uk/the-adobe-hack/

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Not yet, anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
327 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
3602 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS