1438
submitted 5 months ago by hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 144 points 5 months ago

i think actual information is way too difficult to suss out these days with the misinformation campaigns and the paywalls and the trolling, etc.

shit try to do some comparison shopping today and try to figure out which reviews are real and if the thing you're buying is really the thing you think you're buying.

[-] kakes@sh.itjust.works 73 points 5 months ago

The signal to noise ratio is getting worse by the day, unfortunately.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 29 points 5 months ago

Definitely doesn't help, and modern machine learning models are only going to make this problem worse.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

People don't do their own research past the most cursory google searches at best of times, and now google is absolute garbage and the links that are relevant mostly go to massive SEO whale sites written by AI.

That's all before you get to the actual mainstream media sites that spout the same commercial news cycle stories, or spread sensationalized headlines and absolute nonsense. I have managed teams of people and on daily calls people talk about news stories they read like "Did you hear they found another spaceship on mars?" and "They found proof that covid was a Chinese bio-weapon!" and similar statements from working, middle-class people who just browse the websites and social media before work. Most people have very little time to dig into things they see, and now once-reputable sites are just cashing in on clickbait and lies.

This is how most people get their news and information, and it's absolute garbage now. Browse a major news site like MSN and it's worse than grocery store tabloids from the 1980's. And don't even get started about social media like twitter and facebook.

Something happened in the last couple decades that has made people literally just stop caring what's real or not. I feel like it was an attitude deliberately seeded into our culture, and it's now maturing as a society that has lost belief in everything and accepts anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

That's kind of the point.

We now have access to the information, and we've discovered that all along it was our inability to distinguish between misinformation and real information that was causing the stupidity.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Another issue is that information is easy enough to find that people don't bother to remember things as much anymore, since they can just look up the majority of stuff on Wikipedia or something if they ever need to know it. It leads to people having a smaller pool of background knowledge, which makes them easier to mislead.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago

Stupidity has never been because of lack of access to information. That's ignorance.

[-] expansion921@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Certainly ignorance and stupidity are two different things.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 months ago

To the people saying that this is because of "laziness" or "lack of curiosity":

I'm bombarded with so much information every day that it's not feasible to fact-check it all. I have to pick my battles and take things I care less about at face value until I have a reason not to.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 28 points 5 months ago

I'm bombarded with so much information every day that it's not feasible to fact-check it all.

Source?

[-] sour@feddit.de 9 points 5 months ago

Have you been on the internet? Source: personal experience.

Dude, you're on a link aggregator right now, you can't honestly think that you're fact checking every post you read.

[-] lordkuri@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

I think you missed the joke.

[-] sour@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Very true. Well, probably not a bad thing to assume people are actually that dumb

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 8 points 5 months ago

Look, my username is dumbass, so its totally understandable.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Dude, you're on a link aggregator right now

Source?

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 5 months ago

No, Lemmy. Source is a game engine, dude.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 7 points 5 months ago

Wait, so this isn't the left for dead 2 lobby?

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Your in Portal, this is a test.

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 5 points 5 months ago

Awww man, not again!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 29 points 5 months ago

Nah. We knew the difference between ignorance and stupidity before then.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago

Lack of applicable or pertinent information is still rampant.

Excess information of the stupifying type is everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 21 points 5 months ago

It's still the problem. Information is widely available but misinformation is easier to find and the ones that need information are the ones that find the misinformation

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Not only that, but the good quality information is often blocked behind paywalls

[-] Veticia@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago

The problem with internet was always that access to bullshit is way easier than access to information. Except now the difference gets exponentially bigger, and bullshit is indistinguishable from truth.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Good information isn't everywhere. You have to work at finding it or pay for it
Bullshit is everywhere. You have to be careful you don't step in.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago

Yes and no. If people had access to correct information, rather than every passing thought anyone has ever had ever, including complete fabrications and things that were never meant to be taken seriously, then they'd probably be okay.

Even making a claim about what is true and factual seems to be a point to be argued on the internet lately.

We've given everyone a voice and access to everyone else's voice as well as access to all information. Most are lost in the noise, and can't find the signal.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

It's also let the wackos(technical term) converge into echo chambers and amplify their voice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 17 points 5 months ago

I remember seeing a lot of people expand their horizons on all kinds of topics when the internet first started catching on.

Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Now I think it was because they were actively looking for understanding something new, and did not represent the general population.

Assuming that intelligence (and I don't mean IQ or any other psychometric "proxy" for intelligence, but intelligence as an abstract trait) is normally distributed like most other traits, 50% of people are going to be dumber than average because in normal distributions the mean is the median. The "general population" is not smart by any definition.

And anyone trying to claim that intelligence as a concept is completely socially constructed and that there is no difference in intelligence between people, or tries to conflate IQ etc psychometric measures and intelligence, can shove it up their ass.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Turns out, people are just stupid and the more information access you give them the more they can reinforce their stupidity with other idiots' opinions

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

The human brain doesn't seek logic, it seeks validation and a storyline to explain how you feel. It will whip up stories very easily, but even easier if they're supplied.

So this system has been exploited to the extreme. It's our largest vulnerability as a species, that someone can make us feel an emotion and then attach a story to it, and our brains will adhere to that story without question.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago

Ex-fucking-actly. Like I said in another recent comment, the problem with the internet is that it allows the worst people you can imagine to form communities, and instead of them essentially dying alone and shunned by anyone who isn't a complete psychopath they start to think that their fuckwittery is not only acceptable but common

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

I truly believe it’s a lack of curiosity, people simply are not interested in learning more than they have to.

That’s why I see curiosity as a gift. Friends think I am intelligent, but I’m simply curious enough to learn things.

[-] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

Agreed. Smart people aren't smart because they simply are. They're smart because they learn how to learn. They learn the recognize that the steps to success involve failure. Being smart is about being willing to feel stupid, since anything new you learn/try you're going to feel overwhelmed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] menas@lemmy.wtf 13 points 5 months ago

We shall not confuse data and information. With internet we have access to a lot of data, but information is hard to find. Furthermore information are structured by the institution that made it : university, TV, newspaper, and social network Those dominant institution are not very interested in homelessness or other class struggle in your neighborhood. So relevant information for your social and geographical position is even more rare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

People here seem to be mistaking stupidity as a measure of intelligence. Stupidity is a measure of wisdom.

An abundance of information doesn't fix stupidity in the same way that shoveling water out of a boat with a leak won't stop it from sinking.

You have to address the leak before shoveling water becomes productive. Or to circle back around, you have to address how someone learns, parses, and applies information before feeding them more information becomes productive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ofcourse@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Late 90s to 2000s was the decade of internet glory. Then social media and big tech took over. Now with personalized feeds and searches, along with conflict promoting engagement metrics, many people spend their time within echo chambers and those chambers keep getting more partisan. On top of that, rampant misinformation has made it all the more difficult to separate fact from fiction.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Then social media and big tech took over.

Things like BBSs, Usenet and IRC are all social media. So is Lemmy for that matter.

I don't think social media itself is the problem, it's the big tech / purposefully biased algorithmic content selection part that screws it up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

Sure, but let's not remove our libraries please.

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 9 points 5 months ago

We've had libraries since long before the Internet. I don't think lack of access to information is as much to blame as lack of time and/or willingness to make an effort.

Also, we live in a culture that celebrates, glorifies and rewards stupidity to an insane degree. There is simply very little incentive for people to try and improve themselves.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Plus the access to misinformation. Now where even more stupiderer,

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Kinda? I figured that there's some portion of the population that's not smart - bell-curve statistical distribution and all that. But I always thought that the problem was education, or rather, access to a good^1^ education and all the socio-economic and political boundaries around that.

To be blunt: modest to insanely powerful people have something invested in keeping such barriers high, and it's worrysome.

  1. Good = a program that teaches critical thinking and has access to liberal arts, trades, traditional arts, libraries, and information technology.
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

It's called the Information Deficit Hypothesis.

And yes, it's been proven wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure it's a complex soup of dis/misinformation, conservative (not necessarily the political type) leadership, laziness, indifference, lead poisoning, and a kaleidoscope of logical fallacies.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Stupid, ignorant, misinformed, and gullible are all different things.

Access to information helps with ignorance, and even then only if the ignorant person isn't too dumb to understand or hear had their mind poisoned with falsehood.

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

I think what we currently see is too much misinformation.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
1438 points (98.1% liked)

Funny

6854 readers
324 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS