326
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 28 points 4 months ago

Incorrect. He totally understands the sign. The sign may have encouraged him more.

[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Its a picture of a cat with a line though, which on its own means "no cat". But then they wrote NO at the top, it's a double negative and the cat is smart enough and pedantic enough to point that out.

Ah....

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago

Ackshually, it looks like he's just now entering the room. Prior to this photograph, he was violating the room's strict "no no cat" policy with his absence.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

And even if he could read it, he wouldn't give a fuck. He's a cat.

[-] abcd@feddit.de 6 points 4 months ago

The sign clearly states black cats with white faces. So no rules were broken.

But even if the sign was correct AFAIK cats, they would not give a shit and do what they want anyway 🤣

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
326 points (97.9% liked)

Funny

6689 readers
172 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS