"The more people know about me, the less they like me! It's not fair!!"
Facing the consequences of your actions is not a form of victimhood
I would like to go to dinner in Fort Collins with my boys and not have random people come up and video us, you know?
Bull. Shit. You chose to be an attention seeking loudmouth.
"when people find out how I act, they don't like me!"
How old have I become that the principal now looks young???
He’s44/45 In Breakfast Club.
What movie is this from? I see a very young Bardem
The Breakfast Club
The Breakfast
Appreciate it...that's one of those titles I've heard so many times and never watched it, finally committed to and just finished watching it, really enjoyed it. The dialogue is so sharp it reads more like a theatrical production, so well done it almost doesn't seem like a movie, my how times have changed.
Maybe don't do things that people find repulsive.
Handjobs aren’t repulsive!
It's the things that come OUT of her mouth that bother me, not what goes IN it
I can't confirm that sentiment.
I have no idea who has been in her mouth, but I'd assume some of them would be repulsive too.
Have you not heard the story of how she met her husband?
They are when there’s children present.
"The goddamn media keeps reporting on what I'm doing and its making people dislike me!
THIS ISNT FAIR! HOW DARE YOU REPORT THE THINGS I DO AND MAKE PEOPLE NOT LIKE ME!
EVIL DEMOCRAT MEDIA WOKE LIBERAL COMMUNIST MANIPULATION!"
Problem: the more people know about me, the more they despise me.
Solution: get angry at the media for telling people stuff about me.
Yeah. That checks out.
Oh, sweetie, it's not the media doing that...
Ok, so I laughed at some other post a few minutes ago cause it was pretty funny. But this is genuinely funnier.
"How dare you ask me about my public actions at a public event and the response that I gave when it blew up in my face! You're all a bunch of assholes!" - Summary of her response to a question during a televised debate.
All she has to do is drop the media-seeking bullshit and/or stop being a public figure. It's free and easy.
I'm not scientifician, but I'm pretty sure it's a politician's job to get people to like them, not the media.
They could gasp work FOR their constituents, amazing how people like that
If you think about it, it is when it comes to most of the Republicans.
I guess, but even Trump does the leg work by saying things he knows people want to hear.
FA...FO <- she is here
was it really fucking around though? I mean, they hadn't gotten past second base....
By being a chaotic and unsuitable person for public office, is the cause of people waking up and realizing they made a mistake in believing in Boebert. Consequences for playing stupid games, are always paid in full eventually!
She's gonna end up back on sugar baby sites
Isn't there a cap on age?
The microscope confirms you're an infectious piece of shit
"The more people get to know me, the less they like me. This is so unfair."
She couldn't get enough media attention!
Just like the rest of those idiotic Republicans, they don't like their words being reported because it puts them in a bad light. But that's just who they are, shitty people that no one likes because of their shitty thoughts.
This is why the 3 pillars of democracy are:
They hate all three of these and if they aren't doing nothing you can bet republicans are trying to attack one of those tenets. In this case her problem is "media attention" and not "the media are showing the public exactly what kind of scum I am".
I'd also argue a good education is very important.
"How dare you hold me accountable for my actions!"
How stupid can one elected official be?? 😂
I want to insult her and everyone like her, but there aren't enough adjectives and profanities in existence to do the task justice.
Proving once and for all that she's not even aware that her horrible behavior created a cycle of negative press, then supporters donating to her or the RNC as a knee jerk reaction. Truly amazing.
Implying the public ever wasn't against her.
Narcissist never think they are the cause of their problems.
The people that voted for her pay attention to media that isn't Fox News?
She's still probably going to win her primary though. If it were her against a single other Republican she'd be in trouble, but there are five other candidates, none of whom are willing to step aside for the strongest contender, so there's a good chance Bobert is going to skate through with some shockingly low percentage of the vote.
I dunno, the primary debate didn't do her any favors either. The moderator took ZERO shit and her competitors grilled her on her lack of any bills signed. Granted, I still don't remember who the hell her competitors are, but maybe Republicans give a shit.
I'm pretty sure it's the fact that she's intellectually a brick with no critical thinking skills...We don't want folks who can't even keep their own home navigated the correct direction whilst hatefully pushing ignorance and inappropriate enthusiastic handy jays in public... she's unfortunately to ignorant to recognize how her hateful lack of knowledge affects her ability to do her job.
Nice tits though....but that's like winning microwave dinners as the consolation prize in a gameshow. low quality microwave dinners
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.