405
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 108 points 5 months ago

Not stunning to anyone who's paid attention. So I bet there's lots of people who are deeply shocked by this.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

That assumes they are paying attention to this.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah... it's a joke that makes me sad though.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Morose humor is simply a way to deal with tragedy and sadness. It's often the most we can do for ourselves or anyone else in such situations. Seeing as in this situation especially it would require to impress upon people the importance of Being educated in general and about specific things that they have no interest in. Both of which are generally out of our control. So we all just default to recognizing the absurdity.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Don't get me wrong, I'm not faulting you or anything... it's both absurd and sad that major alarm bells have been going off about Trump for a very long time and a lot of people don't notice or look the other way.

Better to laugh than cry I guess.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I didn't think you were :-) and unfortunately Trump is just the most recent symptom. It's been going on for longer than even my parents have been alive. And they were born in the late 40s and early 50s. At least here in the US.

Grandpappy Bush was tied to a coup in the 30s

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

No. It is not.

[-] bcgm3@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, this revelation didn't get so much as a raised eyebrow from me.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Stunning they finally said of out loud. Of course they wait until they got a TV appearance vs, you know, calling it out at the time.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 80 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But Biden is old and, according to this poll I found, unexciting

How will I decide whether voting is even important at all; I’m not motivated

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Or the ones who say they can't vote for Biden because he's not doing the things he's not got the power to do. All in pursuit of some ephemeral moral High Ground. Which they think exonerates them of all the genocide and killing that will still happen. Possibly even increase if such actions were to be taken.

They all think they've got a simple easily implementable answer to all the problems. Despite the best minds of generations of people having been unable to actually solve it. The ignorance and hubris is palpable.

I think the easiest and most simple to implement solution to all this. Would be to time travel back to the selection of places for Israel to be carved out of. And hard veto Palestine somehow.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't understand your comment. Are you being sarcastic?

Edit: downvoters, it was a genuine question. Nowadays it's hard to know when people are being serious or sarcastic. I'm glad the poster was sarcastic in the end.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 39 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am

I am lampooning a certain population on Lemmy who like to come up with an endless variety of specious reasons not to vote for Biden. Some of their reasons are pretty much exactly as I stated, and to me they are outweighed by “Trump wants to kill anyone who disobeys him, so we shouldn’t put him in charge of the military” among other issues, and so hence the lampooning.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Thanks for clarifying. I totally side with you :)

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah, it’s a perfectly fair question. Idk what the downvotes are about but be not afraid; they can’t hurt you.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Ex Trump official confirms what we all assumed …

FTFY

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 35 points 5 months ago

So what?

At this point, anyone who’s a Trump supporter secretly (or quite vocally) agrees with the policy of executions.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Why is it that those who are most vocal about being American don't understand what that means?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Because idiots think they're better than everyone.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

There's a name for that.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

She sat in the same room and did nothing. Now enjoying playing the other side as a political commentator on CNN. Just sayin.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

"Stunning"? As in "actually surprising anyone"? Well, I am not the least surprised.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Trumpets: as long as it’s the right people, we love it.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Kaitlan Collins, to her credit, interviewed Bill Barr and asked about an anecdote that I had shared about a meeting he and I were both in the Oval Office, where Trump straight up said a staffer who leaked a story should be executed. And Bill Barr kind of danced it and said I don’t recall that specific instance, but there were others where we talked about executing people. How do you rationalize that is a person fit in sound judgment to be president of the United States?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

At some point all of these MAGA people will have to be stopped permanently or another country will invade us and punish us for doing nothing to stop them but voting and crying online.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Why would anyone invade when our enemies could continue watching us rot from the inside?

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

A ground war in the US would be over before it begins. Infiltrating via the internet and collapsing the social fabric, on the other hand, is a very viable strategy that we're watching right before our eyes :D

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Abdulrahman_al-Awlaki

What a president can do to the least of us they will do to the rest of us.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If you notice the contrast between jurors that convicted dementia donnie vs. those that convicted Hunter....the difference between the two "sides" here is thrown into stark contrast.

No matter how much the "liberal media" tries to bothsides the two parties, they just cannot cover it up.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

What do you mean by the juror comparison? I didn't follow the Hunter trial (because who the fuck cares lol) so I might be out of the loop

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The jurors for Hunter were out there giving interviews after the fact. The jurors for donnie are more or less in hiding as far as I can tell.

And for good reason. It's not "both sides"; the Republicans have been getting crazier and more violent every year and they adore donnie the wanna-be dictator. They were trying to dox the jurors, and the jurors would be right in trying to keep quiet and lay low and hope to keep their identity secret. Honestly, if he "wins" this fall, and I were them? I'd get the fuck out of this country. A great many of the donnie leg-humpers are crazy and murderous.

Meanwhile, as you point out - who GAF about Hunter, honestly. His plea deal being spiked and this trial is likely entirely political, but if he faces consequences for misfiling some paperwork while addicted to crack, I doubt any Democrat or leftist is going to be making death threats to anyone, least of all the jurors that found him guilty.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Ahh yeah that makes sense, thanks for the explanation, 100% agree with you

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Wow im so stunned

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago
[-] flicker@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

No, no, no.

[-] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Didn't french minister Robbespierre say and act same in french revolution aera? Before he was executed by his own people.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I would have been astonished if he hadn’t. I figured he’s the typical old white Republican where the answer to every irritant is to kill it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
405 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS