52
submitted 4 months ago by git@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Skeleton_Erisma@hexbear.net 52 points 4 months ago

banning the DJI

sicko-pog

It's not the dow jones

sicko-no

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 50 points 4 months ago

why the fuck do I live here. honestly this is a stupid petty thing to consider as a tipping point but this country is heading in a very stupid direction. At least I could be like "well obviously this place sucks but China is doing cool stuff" but now they're trying to cleave the world in two and trap me on the boring fascist side of it.

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago

Edgy 12 year olds when they learn that the Nazis aren’t a bunch of funny, misunderstood teenagers and 20-something’s on 4chan and are lined up to be executed because they watched porn once boowomp

[-] CommunistBear@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago

Idk about you but I'm stuck here. There's no real way I can get out of this fucking place. I have no education nor vast sums of cash to buy my way out. My best case scenario is finding a foreigner to marry and gtfo that way but I'm pretty sure my partner wouldn't be too happy about that

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago

Is this just banning a particular brand of drones because they're a Chinese company?

[-] git@hexbear.net 44 points 4 months ago

One of these sections, H.R. 2864, or the Countering CCP Drones Act, was added to the bill and can be found under Section 1722. For those who are just hearing about this for the first time, it would remove DJI’s ability to get approval from the FCC, banning any future drones from being imported and possibly grounding current drones.

Yes.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

Isn’t this another instance of “You’re not allowed to make laws specifically targeting one company” like why TikTok is probably gonna win their court case? Or are they relying on the Supreme Court deciding that’s fine with the TikTok one?

[-] RuthlessCriticism@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago

Tiktok is not going to win the court case. Laws exist to serve capital.

[-] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes exactly. Laws exist to serve capital, they’re not going to make an anti-business decision like that. That’s why the constitution says you can’t write a law targeting one company. Because laws exist to serve capital. I will genuinely be shocked if TikTok loses their case

[-] itappearsthat@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

The capital they're serving here is domestic tech moguls who are drooling to buy TikTok at forced-sale prices

[-] frippa@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

the Countering CCP Drones Act

Damn why does the US hate me so much?

Seriously tho, wtf is that name lol.

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

CCCP Drones Act

cyber-lenin

[-] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

I'm guessing they have some kind of provision blocking Chinese owned companies in general, but it'd be funny as fuck if they just reincorporated as a new, near identical company and kept on.

[-] GaveUp@hexbear.net 34 points 4 months ago

Lol I'm pretty sure the US police and military are filled with DJI drones cause it's the best consumer grade you can buy

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago

Yeah, this is gonna impact so many industries. If I thought lawmakers were smart, i would suspect there's another drone company in the wings waiting to swoop in for the profits, but they've convinced me otherwise.

[-] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 33 points 4 months ago

At this rate America's going to ban fucking flat screen TVs

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Would be hilarious if that led to a domino effect of people becoming politically active and overthrowing capital because they no longer have access to their circuses.

[-] O__O@hexbear.net 30 points 4 months ago

America is where free markets rule and products succeed or fail by being better or worse than their competitors. Unless you’re a foreign company or you don’t bribe enough politicians. Then you will literally have laws passed that ban you from selling your product or even from owning it.

[-] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago

It's like my CPC handler always says, "Learn to hack, learn to drone."

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

lol this definitely will impact the economy. in agriculture, DJI/XAG (both chinese) drones are increasingly used in spraying operations because they're cheaper and more efficient than sprayers, there are many businesses that make a living providing this drone spraying service and there is no competition to DJI/XAG, banning it will hurt these businesses and producers since they'll have to go back to less efficient sprayers. It's not huge but these add up.

[-] IzyaKatzmann@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Interesting, i figured the existing plane things or whatever for spraying could not be out-competed by drones. It's fascinating how far drone tech has come

[-] CDommunist@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

Dick jerk insanity

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

so.. they're gonna give me my money back then right?

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

Yankees are just banning everything China aren't they? Can't compete, so they ban.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
52 points (100.0% liked)

news

23482 readers
818 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS