260
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The newly required course emphasizes de-escalation and non-threatening conduct for officers

Georgia is the first state to mandate training in election law in order for police to become state certified, a reflection of lessons learned in the aftermath of the state’s 2020 race.

The new requirement for police trainees to take a one-hour course on election laws is meant to keep officers from trying to guess at how to enforce the law on election day, said Chris Harvey, deputy executive director for the Georgia peace officer standards and training council.

Cops just really need to know what are some of the basic ground rules around elections and voting, because they’re very specific,” he said. “In my opinion, the worst thing that can happen is if you have a partisan person or partisan force trying to manipulate the police, and have the police not have any idea what they’re supposed to be doing.”

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 39 points 5 months ago

Wonderful. I can remember 2012, [when dinosaurs walked the Earth] and all election disputes could be covered by a retired school teacher with a clip board. Thank God we have armed military taking over!

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

The training is a mandatory 8 hour course, 4 of which are spent at the shooting range, an hour for lunch, 4 15 minute donut breaks, a 30 minute election class (optional) and two and a half hours of "networking."

[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

A single hour long "class"? This seems similar to corporate diversity training at a company rife with racism. I hope I'm being too cynical and this truly is a good thing that will lead to positive results. I have serious doubts though. If it goes the way of the aforementioned diversity training, it'll be an hour that attending police will treat as mandatory bs they ignore.

The training absolutely needs to happen, don't get me wrong. It's just that this looks a hell of a lot like technically trying without actually trying.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I can't imagine there's much to cover on the topic. Plus, it leaves the cop no way to claim ignorance if he fucks up.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I was anti “election integrity” laws until this specific case. I absolutely believe the police need to be taught how to compose themselves and operate during elections.

This is actually in service of securing our elections and making sure the democratic process is respected. Not that ridiculous dog whistle by Republicans where they get to play Calvinball all day to shut down places and purge voter rolls at the last second.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 months ago

Regarding the Georgian law about providing water to people in polling queues:

In August 2023, a federal judge ruled narrowly to eliminate the bill’s restrictions on distributing food and water in the 25-foot “supplemental zone” around voters. The ruling maintained the bill’s limitations within the 150-foot “buffer zone” around polling stations.

Gotta have special training to properly manage this kind of stuff.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

If they have special training they can no longer claim ignorance.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago

My exact thought was “So they can know they have to enforce the ‘no water’ rule when republicans eliminate more polling stations in cities, eliminate mail in voting, and reduce poll hours?”

Good to know that got some holes poked in it, but… I’m a bit cynical.

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Cool. We need more states to do this. Cops do have a lot of laws and rules they need to know but a one hour class seems like it can’t hurt.

[-] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 months ago

Gosh I desperately wish they actually needed to know the laws, but they don’t.

https://www.vox.com/2015/8/4/9095213/police-stops-heien-v-north-carolina

[-] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

So this is a good thing right? They now can’t claim they misunderstood the law if they have specific training on it.

[-] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

I think that’s the idea, yeah.

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 8 points 5 months ago

The focus on de-escalation and non-threatening behavior is even more noteworthy and important, imo.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Good. Now train them on the rest of the laws for a change while you're at it.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I'm just now realizing that one industry that may benefit most from humans being replaced by robots is law enforcement. Teaching AI empathy and rational reasoning may be easier than teaching humans all the laws and how to let go of their bigotries.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Likely not for any beneficial purpose. Party skewing ramps up the closer it gets

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
260 points (100.0% liked)

News

23397 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS