823
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 195 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why aren't these guys in jail? Seriously. I mean, I know the theory of the rule of law and all, but even our widely-acclaimed greatest president suspended habeas corpus when insurgent seditionists tried to overthrow the Union.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 96 points 5 months ago

I suspect that this is extremely dry humor, but for others that read this, Trump pardoned both Bannon and Stone

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 82 points 5 months ago

it's still unfathomable that trump was "allowed" (I know it was "legal", don't point that out) to pardon his literal partners-in-crime. He basically has already self-pardoned himself by proxy by allowing these traitors to walk free.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ford pardoned Nixon.

Bush Jr pardoned Scooter Libby.

Governor Abbott pardoned a pedophile for shooting a black girl's white boyfriend

Why is this even remotely surprising?

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

the difference being that ford wasn't involved in Nixon's taping. etc. etc.

this is direct involvement, which makes it stink more.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 18 points 5 months ago

I'm not sure if I'm joking. In any case, the writ of habeas corpus is the legal tool that a court can theoretically use to compel the appearance of a prisoner before it. It is the legal doctrine that underlies the right to trial, and I say "theoretically" because courts rarely need to issue one; it's just standard procedure to bring people to court to face charges.

By suspending it, Abraham Lincoln could detain those people he deemed dangerous seditionists indefinitely, because the detainees would have to go to court to challenge their detention, and there was no way to get to court. The effect of suspending it again is that it wouldn't matter that Baboon (autocorrect and I'm leaving it) and Stone were pardoned, or that there were even criminal charges.

Lincoln did it, George W. Bush did it. Barack Obama did it. The Constitution contains a clause which allows it to be suspended due to rebellion or threats to public safety. It's a dangerous thing to allow a president to do, but the MAGA danger might be greater.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

Throughout human history, laws have never stopped conservatism. Jails have never stopped conservatism. Pacifism has never stopped conservatism. Only force has ever stopped conservatism. Only force.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 14 points 5 months ago

As in my other reply, the Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus in cases of rebellion or threats to public safety, and without that writ, charges and sentences are irrelevant.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

The Supreme Court has held that the Constitution contains a right to habeas corpus in Boumedine v. Bush. The Lincoln thing was never fully litigated and was probably unconstitutional.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 86 points 5 months ago

I wonder if they're actually dumb enough to try the false electors scheme twice in a row?

They got caught are being convicted right now for doing it in 2020, and everybody is expecting it now.

[-] m13@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

Whatever the result they’re going to keep trying again. Why wouldn’t they when there are virtually no consequences? Fascists don’t give a damn about what election results say, they’re always going to try to gain power by any means necessary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 58 points 5 months ago

The trials are being sandbagged by republican judges, nobody is actually getting punished for trying to steal the election. They're gonna do it again.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 5 months ago

That's happening more with The classified documents case, not with the fake electors.

Good news, The fake elector charges and trials are actually going through without a hitch, have a lot of defendants informing on co-defendants. Several defendants have already pled guilty, participants are being arrested, more charges are coming, there's actually a lot going on with this case.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

They will. And they'll take it to the Supreme Court, where they'll just install Trump as the winner of the election. Mark my words.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Humbug. I take cynicism lightly.

They didn't get past mailing in the forged documents last time, and they have a worse chance this time.

They'd have to do something different, like state legislatures passing laws that say they don't have to listen to appointed electors.

That's already failed, but that's the tack I think they'll try to refine, since they're approaching it so poorly right now and direct forgeries don't work

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 84 points 5 months ago

How would he know? Trump isn't supposed to talk with felons.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Get those mirrors out of his living spaces.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That's only if he gets away with probation. Due to him talking with felons all day every day and the fact that he's publicly shown ALL of the contempt (in both the colloquial and legal sense of the word) of the court and continues to do so, that's unlikely in spite of the kid gloves he's being treated with.

My guess is he gets community service and I hope it involves picking up thrash while wearing a jumpsuit that matches his skin.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 77 points 5 months ago

I'm a Republican that does their own Research and even though the election hasn't happened yet I ALREADY KNOW TRUMP LOST UNFAIRLY because of Sleepy Joe Biden being UNFAIR!

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

This is exactly how I feel so your comment is one hundred percent correct.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 56 points 5 months ago

The Republicans get away with so much despicable action and each time the Dems get pants by the audacity of the attempt. That's how we are here now.

The conservatives will try absolutely anything, up to and including armed insurrection. Now with AR15s, and probably with bumpstocks fitted.

Don't think that it could never happen. The MAGA element love being underestimated.

[-] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 23 points 5 months ago

So, I work in a gun store(part time), if you think bump stocks are unethical, look up(or don’t) a binary trigger. Those, as far as I know, have never been banned, and are far more effective when it comes to trying to attempt to increase fire rate.

To be honest, a lot of gun legislation is really ineffective. The amount of loopholes etc, are kinda insane. If we’re going to talk about gun legislation, it needs to be a helluva lot more than a part ban on “assault style” firearms, until then, it’s just pandering for votes imo.

(Please don’t assume I am a crazy arsenal wielding person. I actually don’t own any firearms at this moment despite my part time occupation.)

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

I get fundraising texts occasionally. I don't know why. But the one that came on the heels of the conviction had a section of fine print declaring what the money was for. It included a "recount challenge fund". This is in the open.

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 15 points 5 months ago

Well, given how broke the Republican Party is they're probably still paying off the lawyers from their failed challenges from 2020. But they're also planning on doing it again.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

I'm not going to advocate violence for this guy, but can we bring back the pillory or something? Him and Steve Bannon both.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pillory

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 43 points 5 months ago

This shit is going on and yet there’s STILL people whining and suggesting no one vote.

It blows my mind.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Stone and a significant portion of those people are on the same side. A larger amount are useful idiots who prefer to moralize about what should be instead of doing the base amount to prevent more of the harm they profess to care about.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 40 points 5 months ago

Duh.

It’s astounding to me that a second January sixth isn’t at the top of people’s minds this go round.

Not because it’ll be successful (although there’s always a chance) but because we already have elected officials who believe that trump won the 2020 election and there will only be more this time around.

What’s the long term effect of legitimizing disbelief in a functioning democracy? America never was one, but what does it mean when there’s double or triple digit numbers of elected officials who publicly say so?

The usual explanation for distrust in government has nothing to do with people recognizing reality and changing their views based on it but instead blames that change on lack of bread and circuses, no basics of life and no distraction from reality.

We certainly don’t have the basics of life, but the distraction machine is running like a champ slaps hood you could fit like seven more dissociative technologies in this sucker!

What combination of lack of basic necessities and distractions are driving people’s belief (true or false!) that the election was stolen and that our fake democracy is actually fake?

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

The only good news is that if they try to storm the Capitol again, they're not going to have Trump and his "acting" Secretary of Defense giving them cover this time.

Those troops are going to be loaded for bear.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Bro looks like he's a decrepit dollar store ken doll

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Of course the orange turd is going to challenge it, this shouldn't surprise anyone. He wasn't even given a slap on the wrist for inciting a mob to try to overthrow the government. Why wouldn't he try again?

Stone is just a useful idiot which also shouldn't surprise anyone.

[-] skulblaka@startrek.website 25 points 5 months ago

Man, the ballots aren't even printed yet and they're already planning their "Nuh-uh!!!!!!!" for when they lose. Truly, this is the strength and fortitude you expect out of your fascist leaders. Very strong and confident.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 22 points 5 months ago

Yeah it was bad (full video also out there)

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Jesus fuck and I thought don jr. had a coke problem... This dude's whole body is bouncing all over the place with every word he says.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

If there were a cartoon definition of slimeball, this would be included.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Why does trump and his cronies look all weird and creepy

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 25 points 5 months ago

Because they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

Stone: The lights are on, but no one's home.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 5 months ago

“That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have a more honest election.”

Fixed it: “That may not be necessary,” Stone continued. “There are technical, legal steps we have to take to try to have the appearance of a more honest election.”

Stone noted during the conversation that the Trump campaign is attempting to change state voting laws and plans to immediately file a number of lawsuits seeking to change the results should the former president lose again, as Trump allies did in Michigan and several other states in 2020.

This is looking grim. We might have to actually fight on this one. Sigh…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

That thumbnail is terrifying. Genuinely thought it was a dude wearing a roger stone mask wtf

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Stone looks like the bad guy from Star Trek: Generations on a prosperity gospel infomercial trying to sell you on a scam.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
823 points (99.4% liked)

News

23413 readers
2792 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS