185
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 84 points 4 months ago

Rumor That Donald Trump Is Launching His Own Crypto Inspires Countless Similar Scams

[-] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

You mean "in addition to" his crypto scam?

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago

“Rumour of scam inspires scams”

ftfy

[-] niucllos@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago

One could make the case that it is a patriotic duty to divert money from fascists that would otherwise go to fascist causes

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

What would be really funny is if enough of these scam coins popped up to dilute any possible branding around trump’s scam coin.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

So who wants to help me create ChumpCoin?

[-] Case@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

Until people learn the definition of fascism, which... well, I'm in a southern state. Most dipshits support fascism as long as it oppresses the people they don't like.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

Wasn't there already a Trump coin?

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 months ago

Almost, there was a bunch of nft trading cards with grotesque illustrations of Trump super hero’s though.

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

It’ll fail, like so many of his other businesses.

[-] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 12 points 4 months ago

It don't need to success he will still make a lot of cash because of his cultist who would buy anything

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Not so much the cultists as it is foreign agents and America's wealthy buying influence.

Crypto, book deals, art, NFTs, stock buying, are all ways one could funnel money to a political party or candidate that don't technically count as campaign contributions.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

You’re right, but he’s not looking for campaign money, he’s looking for personal gain and some more money for lawyers.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

It’s a way for him to get illegal bribes, it with a veneer of legality.

Like how truth social is worth..,, as much as it is, even though it’s losing money at a prodigious rate. Trump cashes out gets his payday, the other investors get whatever favor they asked for, and all the morons that invested get wiped out,

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

He knows his supporters so well.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

If you buy into crypto at this point, you deserve to lose your money.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


One prominent crypto news account on X, Pirate Wires, even says Trump’s son Barron is taking the lead on the project.

Mike Solana from Pirate Wires later clarified that he hadn’t spoken with the Trump campaign directly about $DJT while warning whoever’s behind the memecoin could “rug pull, or pivot.” It’s not entirely clear what “per conversations” meant in this case.

“I offered to help the people that reached out with legal and biz intros but told them I wouldn’t take anything in return because I got the vibes that the guy who approached me is a Fed.

The report from the Times also highlights the enormous amount of money that’s been donated by Ripple, Coinbase, and Andreessen Horowitz to crypto super PACs in their effort to fight against what they see as anti-crypto House and Senate candidates.

One of those PACs, Fairshake, already ran TV and YouTube ads against Democratic congresswoman Katie Porter in the California Senate primary.

For instance, one scam looks exactly like Trump’s real fundraising website but has the domain donalbjtrump.com, misspelling the former president’s first name as “Donalb.” Any crypto “donations” to that site actually go straight to scammers, as you could guess.


The original article contains 757 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
185 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1900 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS