487
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 116 points 5 months ago

To be fair, men making decisions for women sounds pretty biblical to me.

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Except for that one hippie guy allowing a women to touch his garment unsolicited. /s

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 51 points 5 months ago

These are the kinds of people who Trump will replace regular civil servants with.

Once elected, he plans to use schedule F for the first time to replace millions of civil servants in the USA with people who are blindly loyal to Trump.

Project 2025 is a serious threat to the USA.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Its going to be up to us, the civilians, to get Project 2025 and what it entails in front of moderates and centrists. Its up to use to point out each fascists agenda and go into detail about how that plays out in reality using examples. Its this fight or a guerilla one when we're all under the iron fist of their loving god's theocracy.

Yeah, it's going to be option 2.

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

A defeatist attitude is a fast-track to that outcome.

It's pragmatic, not defeatest.

What's terrifying is that the people responsible for it aren't in prison for sedition and treason. It's literally a playbook on overthrowing the government.

That means the people responsible for protecting the country and our constitution are complicit.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 38 points 5 months ago

All of these dudes look like they'd be uncomfortable to be alone with.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure these guys also run the Blacks for Trump twitter page

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Let the mansplaining begin.

[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 25 points 5 months ago

None of them have ever made a woman cum, I guarantee it

[-] Krono@lemmy.today 17 points 5 months ago

I'm sure the Biblical Womanhood Council has lively debates on the subject.

"The female orgasm is a myth" vs "The female orgasm is a sin"

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

"If God wanted sex to last more than two minutes he wouldn't have made me so sensitive."

2 minutes is enough if you know what you're doing

[-] Hptyhop84@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

They look like extras in The Handmaids Tale.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago

The bible says woman can’t lead and are just to follow. It makes sense then that the council would be all men

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

No, the Bible is used to hold women down by these "Christians".

In actuality it mostly contradicts itself, or says that men and women are equal.

The first evidence people usually cite is 1 Corinthians 11-16. This is the part that talks about women must be silent. However, it says the in the very same passage that they can pray and prophecise in the church. It also says women must remain covered. There are not many even far-right American churches where this is followed. Because we looked at that part and said "huh, Paul is writing to the culture he lives in here and we need to view it through that lens, rather than as actual instructions".

Indeed the same man that supposedly wrote "Women must remain silent in church" also wrote letters extolling the virtues of female leadership of his early Christian church.

And in Galatians 3:28 he says "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."

The culture at the time was patriarchal and women had no rights, but Jesus always preached the antithesis of this, and if Christians were honest about what Christ believed the world would be a much much better place.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

Advisory council on dry-dickedness.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

What? Do all the alter boys have dry-mouth?

[-] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Tell me the world isn't going completely insane one more goddamned time...

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

You say that like this is a recent development for organized religion.

[-] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Not at all, it's just that... dunno, they kept their heads down until relatively recently, it seemed. Now they're going berserk trying to protect Wholesome Values™... And it's not just them, knee-jerks are going off like fireworks in general... This'll only get worse before it gets any better...

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Maybe you just weren't paying attention before, because Christianity has been a major driving force for patriarchy and gender inequality for millenia, literally thousands of years. It's actually only gotten the tiniest bit better in the last 60 or so.

[-] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Just said they seemed to have kept their heads down, which tracks with what you're saying, too. You can't possibly mean that the ebullience with which they're now coming out of the woodwork is "better..."

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I guess I'm just looking at it from a different scale. The oppression of women (and every other person not a cis straight male) has been so much worse for all of human history and has only recently—relatively speaking—been pushed back the smallest little bit. These people have always been here and they've been fighting that progress every step of the way. The right never stopped fighting to overturn Roe v Wade, I heard it my whole life. Just because they lost ground doesn't mean they stopped pushing. If there's woodwork that they're coming out of, you must have put it up around yourself and now you're seeing what the rest of us have been dealing with the whole time.

[-] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You are right in that I tried to keep well and far away from any form of organised religion for pretty much my entire life, yes.

However, the resurgence which I've mentioned seems, to me at least, to have started once the Feminist and LGBTQIA+ movements gained enough mass to be able to significantly influence the policy-making areas of society. At least from personal experience, the Church (speaking primarily about Orthodox and various Catholic denominations, which are more prevalent in our area) mostly kept out of your business as long as you didn't "shout it out" too loudly and kept out of theirs, so to speak - sure, a lot of people have always muttered stuff under their breath when faced with the reality of things, but I honestly believe that most people aligned with said organisations were in a sort of denial about these aspects and chose not to interact with them, in a way.

In addition, people in our area seemed to pragmatically drift away from the cismale-centric view of organised religions, anyway. Domestic violence and sexual abuse have still been fairly prevalent, not going to deny that, but they seemed to stem from how the men have been raised more aggressively on principle around these parts, rather than any concrete religious foundation. People mostly accepted that men and women are essentially equal from, as I've said, a pragmatic standpoint, as men and women have pretty much always worked side-by-side here. May be a result of the fairly agrarian and subsequent "Communist"/"Socialist" tendencies which have been prevalent up until relatively recently - couldn't exactly deny that women are as capable as men when they were openly and constantly doing mostly the same things and just as well.

But as soon as the aforementioned actionable progressive mass had been reached, the counter-action started. Again, not saying it's ever been significantly better just because the Church kept its mouth shut so far, but it's definitely getting worse than it has been in, say, the past two or three decades - case in point, we didn't see Advisory Councils on Biblical Womanhood (Jesus Christ...) being established, because, I believe, they didn't think they should have taken things seriously enough to do it until now. And while we're not seeing such councils popping up around here, we are seeing the Church going berserk and shoving its way into politics in a much more active and aggressive manner than the passive influence they were convinced they had - which they did, in a way, but nowhere near what they now want.

This may just be a difference in what levels we're analysing, as I see this recent uptick, even if present on a relatively smaller timescale, is indicative of a fresh sort of panic, which I believe is and will continue to be more aggressive and thus more dangerous than just ignoring the problem and hoping it'll go away by praying. It's a 'knowing there's a sleeping bear in the nearby caves' vs. 'waking it up by making too much noise' situation (I'm all for the noise in this case, just to be clear).

[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

the world

Nah, just the US

[-] Arkaelus@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Oh, no, believe you me, it's global... I'm at the far end of Europe and Right Wing nutsos and religious zealots are goin' crazy over here, too..

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Definitely not just the US. Some places have turned worse but some have never even been "this good". The world is a fucked up place

[-] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 3 points 5 months ago

This kind of stuff is not normal around the world. Most of the world is not perfect but a lot more reasonable. Luckilly its mainly a thing in extremist cultures

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I mean... Religion is no place for a woman who wants to have a voice

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

"It's a place for women to be on their knees." - Christians

[-] Delonix@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I guess it's this https://cbmw.org/

I checked staff, board and council. First two seemed to be all men, council had some women in it. Less than half but surprisingly many.

The mission of The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood is to set forth the teachings of the Bible about the complementary differences between men and women, created equally in the image of God, because these teachings are essential for obedience to Scripture and for the health of the family and the church.

created equally

Hmm...

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago
[-] halykthered@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Do they all get dressed in pitch black darkness?

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

How is this a microblog meme?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It’s a meme from a microblog? Is that not right?

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

I guess by literally the broadest possible definition of "meme" this qualifies, but personally I didn't join this community to see some random picture of some idiots I don't care about. I joined to see screenshots of the funny jokes, puns, and observations people post on microblogs. This post is utterly devoid of value.

What exactly are people supposed to get out of a post like this? Is it meant to be funny? Interesting? Upsetting? Is it some kind of political thing where people just upvote because they disagree with these guys? I literally don't get why anyone who is interested in seeing "microblog memes" would upvote this image.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
487 points (98.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5846 readers
938 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS