151
submitted 1 year ago by RealRichie@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

I tried to block the anti-adblock and ended up just adblocking the entire website by accident. Guess I didn't need to read the article after all.

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I go straight to this conclusion when I hit a "Subscribe for only 5 dollars a month* or "Give us your email"

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Damn, now they can't celebrate war criminals being given the nobel prize for peace.

[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

It's the science prizes that are given out in Stockholm. The peace Prize is given out in Oslo. The real reason they decided to uninvite the aforementioned countries is the king told the committee that he didn't want dictatorships at a party where he was handing out the prizes, and threatened not to come.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

the king told the committee that he didn't want dictatorships

wonder-who-thats-for

[-] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah the king of Sweden is such a ruthless dictator.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

It's racist to not give a black war criminal the Nobel Peace Prize.

[-] Murvel@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Not even the same commitee dimwit

[-] mashbooq@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Damn, now war criminals can't celebrate with those getting the Nobel Prize for science

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago

There will be plenty of Western ones present I am sure

[-] mashbooq@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

What about, what about, what about

[-] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't even get how this one is a whataboutism to be honest, you literally stated that war criminals can't celebrate with Nobel Prize winners and then somebody pointed out that there will be in fact be representatives from countries that have committed war crimes, or more accurately, have fulfilled every qualification for being war criminals but haven't been sentenced or punished because they control the institutions.

if you'd have said "Russian, Iranian, and Belarusian war criminals can't celebrate..." then you'd still be a complete fucking dipshit but at least you wouldn't be totally incorrect in your accusation.

[-] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Neolibs use "whataboutism" to avoid responding to comments that actually make them consider whether their beliefs are silly or not. Instead of actually considering the argument they slit out a buzzword and promptly ignore whatever was said.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Well yes, what about it?

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

The kbin thumbnail is literally a frost giant. I'm imagining the old norse gods proclaiming who gets to go to the nobel prize ceremony. https://kbin.social/media/cache/resolve/entry_thumb/9c/d1/9cd1f6e2e1daa45dde936c4a1a7f948946313edda2debb4294e9b0b8d8040c6c.png

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I love this glitch

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

This kind of selective application of values - where warcrimes are ignored or acknowledged purely based on geopolitical alignment - is more loathsome to me than no application of values at all: cynical, bad faith, weaponised hypocrisy.

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
151 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32283 readers
1581 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS