270
submitted 5 months ago by EndlessApollo@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 119 points 5 months ago

I think it's a bit unfair they call it just "paint" when it was merely cornstarch that would wash off by itself.
There's a huge difference in the degree of vandalism if it's something that wash off by itself.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

How and what will these crazy activists vandalize next? Shining a flashlight at the pyramids?!

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago
[-] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

TO RAISE AWARENESS, WE WILL BE TURNING OFF THE SUN TONIGHT AT (checks weather.gov) 8:02PM

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

First of all, you have no proof that it was I who stole the moon.

Second of all, after I did steal the moon, I put it back.

[-] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 5 months ago

I'm sorry, I think you mean "blasting the pyramids with photons."

[-] EndHD@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

photons traveling at the speed of light too! that's quite dangerous

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spaduf@slrpnk.net 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is by design and most people fell for it entirely. Even the second highest content in this thread is carrying water for big oil.

[-] june@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 5 months ago

It's possible. And I think it's likely. That the activists wanted this exact news cycle, where they falsely report that there is damage, gaining widespread coverage, and drawing attention their way, only for people to later learn that it was temporary and grow to respect the act.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 months ago

Possibly. I'd imagine the vast majority of people don't see the followup that there wasn't damage, here, or the Mona Lisa, or the other events. The goal was outrage coverage for sure, and without causing damage so anyone who actually cares is fine with it. The media will just call it paint, and now that the potential for damage is clear they'll stop talking about it.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Media uses language like this on purpose, most of their copy comes from single-sources and everyone on every news station is repeating the same rhetoric. They did this with the soup/painting incident as well, making it seem like the protestors ruined priceless artifacts instead of spilling harmless food products on a sheet of plexiglass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 71 points 5 months ago

All that hand wringing over what kind of protest should be ok, you guys are exhausting. The kind of protest doesn't make a difference at all. A lot of people will say it's unacceptable no matter what. I'll even admit sometimes a protest misses the mark, but I'm still glad they did it.

The kids are alright

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

My only opinion is that if the protest dosen't hurt the owner class, then it's not going to do anything anyway.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Any protest is better than complaining or arguing on the internet. I'll let the tactics to the actual people doing their actions. Nothing but encouragement from me 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

But Flying Squid said it was irreparably damaged with crack seepage or whatever

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

I wonder when these protests will turn into actual oil executive assassinations like in Ministry for the Future. We're already rushing our way into a heat wave mass death event.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

That is what I was hoping to hear.

And I still say doing a stunt that even makes it look like you've done some real damage to Stonehenge right in the middle of a religious festival does not make you look like the good guys. People in another thread said it spread awareness. Who isn't aware? I'm fully aware of climate change and there's fuck all I can do about it.

But at least it was not permanent vandalism.

[-] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Not only did they decide to do it in the middle of a religious festival, they did it in the middle of a festival that’s part of a religion that worships nature.

[-] 555@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
  • Who isn’t aware?

Like half of the world is in denial.

How would you spread awareness that translates to action?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Denial is not lack of awareness.

I don't know exactly how I would spread awareness, but I know exactly how I wouldn't: Making people think I damaged a beloved ancient monument during a religious festival... a religious festival, as someone else pointed out, for people who venerate nature.

How about, as an idea, paint bombing Shell Oil headquarters?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Clearly, a good portion of the population isn't aware of how serious the situation is, it's still an election issue.

If the right level of awareness was reached, having any kind of oil money around you would be a political death sentence. Instead, Trump has public bribe meetings with oil execs and his base grows because of it.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
[-] Murvel@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Well good! It'd be fucking travesty to permanently damage a world heritage

[-] rimu@piefed.social 25 points 5 months ago

Yes and climate change, also caused by people, is going to more than damage a whole shitload of world heritage.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
270 points (92.7% liked)

News

23388 readers
1842 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS