274
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 96 points 4 months ago

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) is getting called out on social media after she called out White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre a “DEI hire,” a term that many consider racist.

No, we don't consider it racist. It is in fact racist, and in this case both racist and sexist. That is the entire point Boebert said it. Why else would she have used the term, indeed.

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

and in this case both racist and sexist.

Why else would she have used the term

Jean-Pierre is also LGBT.

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Cool? But DEI is used as a stand in for the n word, it's entirely about her race.

[-] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I assure you DEI is used as more than the n word

[-] III@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Some people might say that Boebert herself is a DEI hire, but that is not true. Uneducated, hate-filled dullards are not considered diverse candidates.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Because if you don’t quote someone it sounds like you’re saying it and then you get sued

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

But she is a racist.

And that’s not a quote. That’s a “quote”

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

"Lauren Boebert" "called" ""Racist""

[-] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

Truth is an absolute defense

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's almost impossible for a public figure to win a defamation suit. Especially a politician.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Lawsuits are expensive as hell, especially for smaller publications

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

It is a journalistic standard.

Person is called ""

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Does this work better for you?

Lauren "Racist" Boebert Outed as Racist.

[-] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 37 points 4 months ago

Wouldn't Boebert also fall under the DEI umbrella as a woman representing the trailer trash demographic?

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

No. She falls under the porn star demographic. Which isn't a protected class.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sex workers contribute to society, unlike Borbert

[-] III@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

For a long while she was reducing the effect of pedophilia on her local community. Then she divorced him...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The funny thing is that, despite Boebert being racist about it, if the Biden administration hired her due to a lack of diversity in White House press secretaries, that's a good thing.

Of course she doesn't see it as a good thing, she thinks all the information a president puts out should be said by a white person.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There is a fundamental assumption among anti-DEI conservatives that there is only one Best Candidate for any job, one who conveniently looks like them. Anyone who look different, then, obviously can't be the Best Candidate, so someone must have "tipped the scales" to get them in.

Diversity is important because it leads to better ideas, particularly in matters of public policy that affect everyone. I think it's perfectly appropriate for a PR team to use, as one of its hiring guidelines, a goal to assemble people from different backgrounds, which will make everything they produce more relatable to the public. But since Conservatives don't see the value in that at all, all they see is "They wanted to hire a black woman to tick a box", not realizing the value that particular candidate's lived experience brings to that team.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I don't even think it's that they don't understand that a black woman can bring a different perspective than a white man. They just don't think that perspective matters. Heteronormative white patriarchal Christian culture must be maintained at all costs.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

They let other folks in now and then, as long as they play by the rules.

Just look at Clarence Thomas. By any measure, he is a smart man. Dude graduated from Yale Law school in the early 70's when there were very few black folks there. However, major law firms did the same thing back then that Boebert is doing now, and assumed he just got into Yale due to affirmative action, to "tick a box". Rather than blame the inherent racism at the time, he blamed Yale for admitting him in the first place. Which is bonkers, when you think about it.

Once he became a judge, he continued to work to dial back progress made in the 20th century, all because his fee-fees got hurt after law school. And the bribes, don't forget the bribes!

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 3 months ago

No shit she's racist. She's a prominent member of the Racist Party.

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Only for that?

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Okay, cool. Shit heads can say “DEI” hire if other people get to call hiring a shit head cronyism or nepotism or bottom of the barrel hire. Like, we could have hired a talented person of color, but we’re racist so we just scraped the bottom to hire instead. Take your pick.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Racist sack of shit rat hellbent on destroying democracy for money that will be worthless by the time the country crumbles happens to be named "Lauren Boebert"

[-] dynamic_generals@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Do we think jeffw is the editor of lgbtqnation? They’re flooding the community with this source day after day. I’d’ve hoped @news had a higher standard… it’s not news that Lauren Bobert is racist.

Who is it the author says called her a racist? Nobodies on Twitter. We as readers need to respect our time and attention and downvote this junk food reporting. We owe it to ourselves.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I rely on 30+ sources. I do not work for any of them, although I (edit: pay to) subscribe to 3 or 4 (edit: NyTimes, WaPo, Philadelphia Inquirer, and Wired, if anyone cares). Every weekday, I ensure ProPublica’s work gets posted somewhere on Lemmy, that’s probably the only one I never skip.

I don’t alter site headlines and can’t force any outlet to write a better article. The news here is that Boebert said a racist thing. The low-quality journalism thing where they do the “what does twitter have to say about this?” isn’t really important.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Jeff! Your work is indispensable. Thanks for all you do.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Who is it the author says called her a racist? Nobodies on Twitter.

That would only be because our media doesn't have the balls to.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
274 points (94.8% liked)

News

23287 readers
3777 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS