347

Rooftop where gunman shot at Trump was identified as a security vulnerability before rally: sources (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Two sources told NBC News that the Secret Service flagged a building near the rally site as a security concern. Investigators will be scrutinizing how a gunman was allowed to scale it.

The rooftop where a gunman shot at former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally was identified by the Secret Service as a potential vulnerability in the days before the event, two sources familiar with the agency’s operations told NBC News.

The building, owned by a glass research company, is adjacent to the Butler Farm Show, an outdoor venue in Butler, Pennsylvania. The Secret Service was aware of the risks associated with it, the sources said.

“Someone should have been on the roof or securing the building so no one could get on the roof,” said one of the sources, a former senior Secret Service agent who was familiar with the planning.

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is like literally four fucking rooftops near the vicinity of the stage and you didn't think to secure one of them? Thanks for making Trump a hero mf.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 years ago

The second worst thing that could have happened is trump not being assassinated.

The worst thing that could have happened is trump almost being assassinated.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

The thing that most helped his chances happened. And of course this is a pure coincidence

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

based on this logic: if republicans want to really guarantee his victory they should shoot at him more

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

[removed by mod]

[-] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago

Can you stop with this whole false flag BS? The kid was over 400 feet away. The margin for error with a rifle at that distance, shooting for a target that small is zero. A slightly stiffer left to right wind and the bullet shatters his skull and Trump is picking bits of bone fragments out of his brain. Or if he shifts his head tenths of a second before the shooter pulls the trigger. Or if the sights were zeroed the day before.

It's asinine to believe that this was staged. There's a 20 year old kid shot dead on the roof by secret service and a 50 year old bystander dead in the stands behind Trump. Trump got lucky. Just as he always fucking does. I wish that wasn't the case, but that's what happened and now we just need to figure out how we deal with it.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

None of your reasoning follows. You think the shooting is suspicious, but have no evidence to believe it was a "false flag". Don't accuse others of not playing make-believe correctly.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Brave words for someone who commented and then blocked

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

It does follow. If one crazy republican kid shooting at him increases the odds of him being elected why wouldn't a second or third?

[+] vxx@lemmy.world -8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A successful assassination would've been the worst.

Do you really think if Hitler was assassinated anything changed? Maybe a leader with the same goals but without brain rot would've taken over, and not made critical blunders.

If people wouldn't support Putin, he would be long dead by his closest men.

Republicans would have the same agenda but without the guy blurting it out whenever he can.

The machinery is running and you have to stop the machine, not the messenger.

[-] formergijoe@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The RNC starts today. The Republicans would have to scramble to pick a candidate for president the weekend before they show off their candidate for president. It would have caused chaos for them.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe a leader with the same goals but without brain rot would’ve taken over, and not made critical blunders.

People always say this, but I think it's a rather facile analysis.

Fascism when fully instituted basically doesn't work as a governing ideology. Many countries have tried it and many countries have found that out.

Sure, there's sometimes encampments; there's sometimes secret police; there's sometimes using the military on your own countrymen; there's sometimes genocides; there's sometimes surveillance; there's sometimes lots of things...but you know what it always breeds? A government full of distrusting, incompetent, loyalist boobs that are slaves to one man's dumb ass ideas.

There is no competent version of fascism because one man alone cannot "fix it". Even a singular genius cannot rule a modern country based upon just his own ideas, he has to have a group of competent people surrounding him, triaging issues, and analyzing different things...those type of people don't tend to want to work for the type of backbiting, dark triad narcissists that nearly always sit at the center of fascist government.

Fascism leads to dark, terrible things, but it's basically always, at its heart, a kakistocracy.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

gestures broadly at recent SCOTUS decision stripping menial day to day bullshit from experts at their respective agencies to Trump shill judges

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

History would disagree with you. How many dictatorships ended with the death of the dictator?

The dictators usually get killed after they have been thrown over.

How many assissinations have there been that support your claim?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not every dictatorship is fascist.

EDIT: Besides you were originally making the argument that there could be a "more competent" Trump which is what my reply was talking about. Fascist governments are, in my opinion, inherently incompetent. Even the whole "Mussolini made the trains run on time" crap was just rhetoric and propaganda.

There are other forms of government by effectively one "chosen" person (i.e. dictatorships), and I don't think they necessarily have to be fully staffed up with incompetents in the same way fascist regimes naturally have to be.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

Well the US is headed for civil war one way or another, unless they get rid of their current supreme court.

Trump is very much an iconic, celebrity like figure. If you cut off his head, im not sure the republican hydra can magically regrow another head that does what he does.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Imagine one of his sycophants taking control, asserting his authoritarianism in His name. Imaging Cheetoh-head up on the the cross, where now he can be your idol regardless whether even he would be that extreme

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Lmfao trump ain't no hero. Getting shot at doesn't instantly make you a better person. He was a piece of shit before getting shot at and I'm sure he'll act more of a piece of shit after.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

"I like candidates who don't get shot"

[-] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

He isn't a hero in the literal sense, but he is the person who "people are trying to silence", and who is "fighting the good fight", so people will see him as the hero they need to save the US and this attack legitimised his victimising persona

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Has Trump said anything since the shooting? (Other than the announcement he clearly didn't write?)

Normally we can never get the guy to shut up, two full days of silence when he can milk the publicity of this is baffling.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The realization people want you dead can do that though... This isnt The idea that people want to hurt you. But actually knowing they want to kill you. If you could continue thinking this was a outlier them your very naive.

[-] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I stopped expecting normal human behavior from him a long time ago.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

It seems like it would be a very tangible indication of disapproval, and narcissists have a hard time with that.

[-] PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There was a rnc thing today so he's probably had a chance to say whatever he wants since then.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

he will be treated like one though

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, by morons that already treated him like a hero.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

and by the people in the fence who have republican tendencies who were not planning to vote before but will now

[-] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 61 points 2 years ago

Uh oh. The SS better stage another quick phone upgrade so they can accidentally lose all the evidence again.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago

The target is an ongoing security threat, too

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Handrail looks like dude is defending the president with a vacuum.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

Interesting. Welp nothing to see here

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024

347 points (97.5% liked)

News

35800 readers

843 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world