44
Man has theory. (lemmy.world)
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 month ago

Calling it a conspiracy [theory] is a little insane, but this is otherwise downright plausible compared to the pyramid power plant stuff.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm totally with you on this one. I can see the current head being a later replacement.

Although: Anubis had the body of a man, not a lion, so that theory is fucked. If there was a different original head, it was probably something else: a lion, or an eagle, or something; the ancients loved to mix up animal parts in their mythos, so roll a dodecahedron for what it could have been. Not one of the main Egyptian gods, though: those were all human-body, animal-head. Putting one of those on the Sphinx body makes absolutely no sense, and OP^OP^ is a garden-variety moron.

P.S. that silhouette also just looks like a Doberman, which is twice as dumb.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I would also say that claiming it is "not an original" suggests that it's a copy rather than not being the original carving.

[-] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure that big ole nose would require modern reinforced materials. maybe they tried and failed to make the anubis, but i doubt it would've worked very well.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago

They're saying the head was replaced. Better phrasing would be that it is not in its original form.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Re-carved anyway, although I'd like to know what happened to all the original stone. You'd think we'd be able to find it. It's a lot of stone based on that drawing.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

On what? You can't just chip stone off a statue and then hope you find a use for it.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

You can chop it into smaller blocks to use on something nearby, idk honestly but I'd just assume it's easier than bringing a new block from quarry

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

At the age they were building pyramids and would have supposedly recarved the Sphinx, they were mostly using very large stone blocks. They only switched to smaller stone blocks in the Amarna period when Akhenaten had them do it to speed up construction. But that was centuries later.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

If I drew a mustache on the Mona Lisa I think it's fair to no longer call it an original.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Why? Is there an original somewhere else once you do that?

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Your artwork would be an original. It's not an unaltered mona Lisa, but it's still an original painting.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I thought it was a pretty sure thing that the Sphinx used to have a different head. Maybe not totally confirmed, but at least a widely held belief.

Was the original head Anubis? Who knows. Probably a different Pharaoh.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

This is the first I'm hearing about it, but honestly, why not?

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I have a theory that the theorist is very stupid.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure the masonry would collapse with an overhang like that.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
44 points (84.4% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2456 readers
166 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS