864
submitted 5 months ago by blorbo@lemmy.sdf.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 309 points 5 months ago

Man, I'm so happy with the way this is going so far. I sure hope she wins the election.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 78 points 5 months ago

I hope Republicans get absolutely crushed to the point that it becomes clear catering to the extremists and conspiracy theorists is not tenable. Then they have 4 years to try to rebuild from the ashes and try to present a reasonable platform instead of something insane.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

For sure, though I said the same thing in 2020 and was disappointed at how close it was. Really a terrible reflection on the country.

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 47 points 5 months ago

Agreed, and wow, you can really sense the working cognitive function, I have to admit. Especially when only one of the candidates has it now.

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 257 points 5 months ago

Urgh, articles about tweets.

“So think of it: They get me to that position, and then their campaign says, ‘I’m the prosecutor, and he is the convicted felon.’ That’s their campaign,” Trump said. “I don’t think people are going to buy it.”

"We approve this message"

That's it. Don't reward a newssite for this shit.

[-] flerp@lemm.ee 72 points 5 months ago

I'd rather more people rewarded the news site for it then rewarding twitter by going there directly

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

Eh, it was pretty funny though. And it's a complete character change from Biden's campaign.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 126 points 5 months ago

Amazing. I respect Joe Biden and think he had a pretty good term overall, but stuff like this shows just what's been lacking.

On a related note, please let Trump be dumb enough to accept a debate with Kamala.

[-] Sunroc@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Old Biden is too civil for Trump in general.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

He comes from the era when politicians were civil to each other even if they vehemently disagreed. Well before Newt Gingrich started characterizing Democrats as evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago

It's obvious, she is the better candidate. And most Americans are aware of it to. I just hope, they go to the pols when the time comes.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

The problem is getting voters in swing states who don't like Trump to the polls. If all of them voted, he'd be utterly destroyed.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

Historically if Americans vote, Republicans lose. That's why they work so hard to get people to not vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

They just need this team to keep hitting the Trump campaign quickly all day, everyday. He pretty much can't stop embarrassing himself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago

She's bringing a lot of very needed fire.

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

I'm not complaining but I'm genuinely wondering if the dnc has been holding this woman back. I feel like I haven't seen this fire coming from her before and I'm loving it.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Leaning into the "she's a cop" thing, which, fine, might as well.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

Back the blue might have a double meaning now.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Lol, my neighbor across the way put one of those up in 2020, we chit chat so while watering the garden I said "man I wasn't going to vote, but because of your sign yeah, go Biden". I mean I was... But anyway he took down the sign lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wild what you can do when your entire campaign isn't proving you aren't dead.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

Chef's kiss.

[-] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

What a fucking troll. I love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Hire a bunch of god tier TikTok meme shorts creators, and just start churning out shorts ridiculing him.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

Her and the team need to go hard and fast. She's not charisma 101, though she has some. Her real strength is her ability to disseminate and spread information as someone whose career was to become an expert on any information presented, when used alongside existing resources. What does this mean?

She will continue to tarnish Trump's image in the eyes of all the doubtful while increasing her own standing across the board with the exception of the staunch Republican and MAGA supporters. This means hop in the truck and proceed at ramming speed. Every single historically idiotic thing Trump has said. Every piece of racism his team puts out. All the sexism and all the calls to violence against certain groups. Call them out. We can all agree that bipartisanship was the game for a long time, back when the Republicans still had some spine and integrity left here and there. What the Nation needs right now is exactly what she can almost uniquely bring, and we are seeing what I suspect is just the beginning of this little war.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
864 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19240 readers
1380 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS