59
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run to c/newcommunities@lemmy.world

I searched this morning for communities related to polyamory and open relationships. Finding nothing, I created something. If you are interested in polyamory, open relationships, ethical non-monogamy, etc, swing on by for a chat, to post something silly, as you will.

edit: !polyamory@kbin.run

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 106 points 1 month ago

Polyamory is WRONG! You people disgust me!

Mixing Latin and Greek words like that! Either call it multiamory or polyphilia!

The nerve of some people!

[-] Nemo@midwest.social 25 points 1 month ago

This is why I don't watch television.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 14 points 1 month ago

How do you feel about multiphilia? ;-)

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

I never noticed

[-] drathvedro@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

polyphilia

Love that band. Their latest album is the shit.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago

swing on by for a chat

I see you.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Interesting topic. Any link to share?

[-] Elevator7009@kbin.run 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

!polyamory@kbin.run /c/polyamory@kbin.run

Delighted to see another Mbin magazine for once. It is the Fediverse, and lately it's been feeling like the Lemmyverse. Hope this gets users.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

TY! I'm still learning the syntax.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago

I hope you're ready for a deluge of ignorant comments. And some malicious ones.

I'm going quickly enumerate some of the more common responses.

"I knew a poly couple and they broke up!" -> we've all known many monogamous relationships that ended, too. Though it is true that going from a conventional, deeply entangled, monogamous relationship to something else is challenging. Read about the missing step if you're interested. Monogamous people would also benefit.

"It's bad for the kids!" -> the poly people I know who have kids, the kids are doing great. They have more adults in their lives that are invested in them.

"It's just cheating!" -> cheating is when you break agreed upon rules. If the rules don't include "only have sex with one person", then it's not cheating to do otherwise.

"It's just about sex!" -> sometimes! Sometimes monogamous relationships are just about sex. Sometimes they're not.

"I'm too jealous for that!" -> most people experience jealousy. What's important is how you deal with it. If you're the kind of person who has a freak out and breaks into your partner's phone because he smiled at the waitress, that's not ok and not something to be proud of. You can and should work on emotional regulation.

"You poly people think you're better than everyone!" -> some people might. But that's true for any subcategory of people. Vegans. Linux users. City dwellers. Country dwellers. I will say that living unexamined choices I think is the worse choice. If monogamy is something you really thought about and chose, fine, good for you. But if you're just doing it because that's expected and never gave it a thought? Less impressed. The same for eating meat or using windows.

Ok, I think that's all the highlights.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We've already had "it's just about sex". And anyone that's been around has heard all the rest, and more. Let's see how it rolls, without expectations, fearless. And please, when your predictions come to fruition, come help out. It's all about education, and conversation. :-)

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

!polyamory@kbin.run is the link you want to put. Otherwise it just links to !polyamory on the user's home instance.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

I'm confused, both those resolve to the same link, on my screen.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Because your home instance is kbin.run where the community is! Try these. !programming and !programming@programming.dev

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

I see what you mean. And I corrected the link above to what I think is correct. Can you, would you please check me on that? I'm just learning how this all works. Seems there's some federation issues for some users.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

No, you need to literally put !polyamory@kbin.run instead of just !polyamory. It's like dialing someone's phone number who lives in a different country and not including the country code when you don't include an instance.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hmm, do you realize when I copy each of those "!polyamory" (which appear as blue links) above, in your message, and then paste them next to each other in the text editor, that both of them are the same. LIke this: https://kbin.run/m/Polyamory

which further confuses me as to what you are suggesting, as I think I've done what you suggested.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

[!polyamory@kbin.run](/c/polyamory@kbin.run) not !polyamory. It's like trying to email "John". John at what? You're on kbin.run so it goes to [!polyamory@kbin.run](/c/polyamory@kbin.run) like you expect. When I click on !polyamory it tries to go to [!polyamory@programming.dev](/c/polyamory@programming.dev) because my instance is programming.dev.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

Ok, thank you, it appears the fog of ignorance has been dissipated by your brilliance. I apologize for being so dense. This should work a whole lot better.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

It's okay. It's sort of a complicated thing to explain. I was trying to not be overly technical but it's sort of difficult to explain otherwise. ❤️ I subscribed, by the way. I'm excited to interact!

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks friend, you did well by me. Yeah, me too. The @polyamory@lemmy.world group seems good as well. (LoL, hey, it worked!!) It's been my observation that more people all the time are looking for relationship options that fit them better than the standard monogamy model. I used to think that poly was just one of those odd things about me that not everyone shares. And I got ok with that. But the percentage of false paternity speaks to the fact that people want to cheat reproductively or otherwise. Cheating sounds way too dangerous to oneself and one's partners, with STIs, and even with hurt feelings. I prefer to talk about things, so everyone knows what's going on, and each can decide how they want to play.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Open relationships? Isn't that just a group chat 💀

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
59 points (74.4% liked)

New Communities

16843 readers
103 users here now

A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

Rules

The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.

1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.

2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.

Formatting

Please include this following format in your post:

[link text](/c/community@instance.com)

This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't

You should also include either:

!community@instance.com

or instance.com/c/community

FAQ:

Q: Why do I get a 404?

A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.

Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?

A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.

Image Attribution:

Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS