179
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Venezuelans go to the polls on Sunday against a backdrop of hope and fear in a presidential election that could end 25 years of socialist rule – if a free and fair vote is allowed.

Opinion polls suggest that the president Nicolás Maduro, 61, who is seeking his third term, could be defeated by the opposition coalition candidate, retired diplomat Edmundo González Urrutia, 74.

But experts warn that it is one thing for González to gain more votes, and another is for him to be announced as winner by the National Electoral Council, which is aligned with Maduro’s government.

Independent observers describe this election as the most arbitrary in recent years, even by the standards of an authoritarian regime that started with Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chávez.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 85 points 3 months ago

But experts warn that it is one thing for González to gain more votes, and another is for him to be announced as winner by the National Electoral Council, which is aligned with Maduro’s government.

Anyone with a brain knows this, but it demands stating out loud:

This is what Trump wanted from Pence on Jan 6. This is what the insurrectionists on the ground were trying to do on Jan 6. They were trying to invalidate a free and fair election.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump seems to be on a speedrun of saying all the wrong things this election cycle. I wonder if he’d openly endorse Maduro refusing to leave power

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 36 points 3 months ago

I'm sure that with a ballot designed to have all this photos of Maduro, it will be a fair election.

Ironic that voting for a party called "alliance for change" actually votes for Maduro. Change what?

[-] Hubi@feddit.org 22 points 3 months ago

They should've used a different picture of him for each one for maximum comedic effect.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Using the same picture is much funnier

There are huge reports of delays in polling stations where their past outcomes are not favorable to Maduro.

Additionally there's a lingering mood of doubt over the unregulated assistance to vote where this hasn't been requested, huge red flag to fairness and secrecy of votes.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Same as it ever was

[-] sugartits@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Are we honestly expecting this election to be free and fair?

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social -3 points 3 months ago

No. Western media and US government has done everything they can to overthrow Maduro numerous times

https://fair.org/home/as-venezuela-mends-ties-with-latin-neighbors-western-media-turn-up-the-propaganda/

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Shit's pretty fucked up in Venezuela right now. If the elections were free and fair I doubt they'd need much from the US

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Did you read the article. Every bit of news out of Venezuela is lies from the media and the government.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Ok, there are still a few airlines that fly into Caracas (many have pulled out). I'm sure that's a coincidence though. You go there and let me know how it is.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m not saying I am a blind supporter of Maduro, I am just acknowledging that pretty much everything western media and the US government says and reports on Venezuela is a completely fabricated lie.

It’s an indisputable fact

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

So the opposite of everything we hear is actually true, and things are quite peachy in Venezuela? Ok, got it. Thank you for enlightening me! I'm sure all the migrants that made it up here will be thrilled to know they can go back home now

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

You’re very dense if that is your take. You also seem to lack an awareness of nuance as well as critical thinking skills.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just as free and fair as the US where ultra wealthy and corporate donors pick noms and we just have to take the shit served to us.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 20 points 3 months ago

More of this false equivalency shit. There can be different degrees of corruption and authoritarianism. See Russia and China.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

There's no point in even pretending that Russia, the place where "non-loyal" people regularly "fall out of windows", has the same level of corruption as the USA other than to create muddled equivalencies and to simp for Russia.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do you believe Trump lost his last election? Do you believe Putin won his?

Seems to me being able to pick an executive is a pretty good litmus test

[-] Brickardo@feddit.nl 11 points 3 months ago

Name a better pair than Venezuela appearing in the news roll and an election period looming near in a liberal state.

[-] geography082@lemm.ee -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That’s not socialism . That’s a party getting the pockets full associated to foreign interests . At the cost of making poor everyone and having the elections completedly corrupted . Wait, most of all socialist governments in history did the same.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
179 points (91.2% liked)

World News

38930 readers
2212 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS