No.

We had a technocrat masquerading as a populist with Trudeau. Having another technocrat doesn't help with the problem: that most people don't see the Liberals as doing anything for regular people. This is like the Ontario Liberals picking Crombie because they think they need someone more "centrist" and "establishment" to win OPC voters, when the problem is that Doug Ford does a better job of articulating regular people's concerns.

Not that Poillevre isn't worse: He's as much as establishment weasel, only with a shot of fascism to help mask the taste.

If the Liberals want to succeed, they need to prove--before the election--that they're willing to forsake the rich to help everyone else. Right now, they're pulling the usual Liberal bullshit of "we'll do all sorts of progressive stuff, for realz, honest, if you just elect us again!".

Maybe ramp that capital gains tax up on the ultra wealthy? That'd be a good start.

"I don’t like the current PM. We should replace them with someone worse. That’ll teach'em."

This isn't news. It might be an idea that CTV ownership would like to broadcast in the public space.

The Liberals have been handed a highly relevant and relatable example of how to comeback from being down big in an election from south of the border - I'm speaking of Kamala Harris, of course.

No one with half a brain would think that Canadians unimpressed with Trudeau would support Mark Carney and vote Liberal if he's on the ticket lol. But, see my first paragraph for why print this schlock in the first place

Given the shitty job they've done softening inflation and easing the market why would anyone from BoC ever be the answer to anything?