108
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 91 points 3 months ago

Wait, I thought he had “nothing to do with Project 2025.” How do you force out the leader of something you’re not involved with?

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 58 points 3 months ago

I'm starting to think Trump lied to us.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I dare you to prove more than 400 times that he has done this.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago
[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

If it's not in the last 3 seconds, it doesn't count unfortunately

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Oof. Alright, gimme some time to find the right 3 seconds and do a total breakdown. I'm pretty sure it's possible, but it could take a while.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I believe in you

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago

It’s a con.

They “eject” the “frontman,” then claim Proj. 25 is “less of a threat,” save some face to secure moderates’ votes, and then if they win the election they implement proj. 25 anyway, without any changes.

[-] Sordid@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Also, by kicking him out and then implementing it anyway, they take credit for his work. I wonder whether being discarded like a piece of trash the moment he outlived his usefulness came as a surprise to him. A very Trumpian move all-around.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 31 points 3 months ago

Fall guy. Don't fall for this bullshit.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Yup, hell get a cushy job somewhere.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Got rid of the frontman but aren't changing any of their plans.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 22 points 3 months ago

So if he knows nothing about P25, how does he have the authority over its commission to remove someone?

[-] Timii@biglemmowski.win 14 points 3 months ago

Antisemetic leopard felon eats another face. Film at 11.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago
[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He must be one of the good ones if he speaks perfect stupid.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

Now that's it's written he needs to eliminate anyone who can claim authorship. This is so he can use it as a playbook while not appearing to give the plan credence.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

He has probably already concinced himself it was his idea all along.

[-] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He didn't force it out, he made them just shut up for a few minutes

Fuck all of 'em

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
108 points (89.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
2191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS