171
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] absquatulate@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Yeah, privacy. That's definitely what it's for

[-] stepan@lemmy.cafe 26 points 1 year ago

I kinda regret being defederated from Lemmy tankies, I'm curious how are they going to defend this.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

*something something google exist so it's basically the same something west propaganda something fuck Ukraine

There, I saved you from having to interact with that scum

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Red fash defend fascism by appealing to some corny authority. If daddy Xi says it's cool, then it's cool! Because "communism"...

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They don't need to defend this, tankies' values don't include privacy from the state.

But western governments with compliant companies have the same or bigger amount of information on their citizens' activities as China is trying to get.

So here's your whataboutism if you want to discard it, as if someone ever really needed a reason to retreat from argument.

If you don't, I'll add that in my opinion future sucks.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 1 year ago

Shepooh is a real leader in like biden

[-] Dark_Dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

Yea we will protect your privacy. Give us your social security and unique identifier. We won't target you specifically /s

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm going to need you all to send me your bank account details so that I can protect your finances.

I need to fuck your wife so that you can enjoy better intimacy.

[-] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

“Could?” No. “Absolutely would.”

[-] aleq@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

They already have something kinda like this. All public wifis require that you sign in with phone number and SMS-verification. It might not be as air-tight as whatever the article is about (like a chad I only read headlines), but in practice it seems pretty darn tight IMO.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read the article because I was quite sure China already had internet identifiers. This article is just about China wanting to make the government the sole proprieter of internet identities. Propaganda line or not that does make the privacy line make sense as less organizations are tracking your identifiers, and it's not as if the CPC wouldn't have the access to information the non government companies have. My sense is you're not really hiding from them simply by using private companies whenever you can. It's a tighter grip for sure, but it's not going to change much on its own.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago

Yes more "protection".

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So this is different from Korean iPIN because Chinese people can only get it from the government in the new proposal? It looks like they both already tie online presence to traceable identifiers, just Korea allows you to get it from government or private company and China wants to take that ability away from private companies.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Capitalism bad!

...oh wait

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 1 year ago
[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I was making fun people in hexbear and lemmygrad.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Lmao, do you mean CTH will be extra double-banned from mainland China?! How terrible lmao.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 1 year ago

Now do America NYT

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
171 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

73839 readers
772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS