473
Hey Trump, it is a sign of weakness if you change course now.
It would be weird if he changed course this late in the game.
I went against my better judgment and checked out /r/conservative yesterday. In the 2 threads about his “Harris isn’t black” comments everyone is panicking and it makes me very, very happy.
I like how they are finally beginning to realize their "super stable 11D chess playing genius" is actually one of the most dumbfuck politicians we've ever had. Something we all saw from day one. George Bush Jr. looks like a prodigy next to this guy.
It's like I never wanted to forgive the GOP for George then they went and pulled a trump. It all makes sense now. W was the creme of the crop when it comes to the GOP. Literally the best thing they had going for them was that shit head.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
delicious delusional con tears...
Were fucking Republicans. We freed the slaves. We forced through reconstruction. We were responsible for civil rights. We literally have the historical record to make these arguments to the face of these race obsessed garbage people.
LOL. I so laughed at this line. Some people are unbelievably clueless.
Republicans did that. Conservatives fought it every step of the way.
Republican in name only, or RINO. Republicans back then were the same as Democrats today in terms of policy which I find weird.
I know that. You know that. I'm not sure the dope you were quoting knows that.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Notice that while they're posting on /r/conservative they don't use the word "conservative" in that sentence. Because then they'd have to say:
Were fucking ~~Republicans~~ conservatives. We ~~freed~~ fought for keeping the slaves. We ~~forced through~~ fought against reconstruction. We were ~~responsible for~~ against civil rights. We literally ~~have the historical record to make these arguments to the face of these race obsessed~~ are garbage people.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Who cares what her heritage is? He needs to talk about how she sucks at her job and how badly it will go if she is president
Like what?
Nah bruh, your brain is just too liberal to understand why trickle down economics is actually great for the poors
load more comments
(1 replies)
I haven't laughed that hard at conservatives in a long time, good times.
Thanks to this I went browsing through that sub. These people are openly blatantly calling for torture of detainees in Guantanamo.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Well that was certainly eye opening, and not in a good way. Begs the question of how the party has ever been able to unite such a diverse group of delusional and hateful people with out the whole group completely thunder-doming themselves.
They have a uniting principle:
"We deserve to rule, being the heirs of privilege. The world is not fair, and we will keep it that way so that we can be on top."
Reactionaries see the democratization of rights as an assault on them; to them, rights are zero-sum. If someone else (especially a group they've coded as "evil") gets a right recognized, they see it as a personal affront.
One can see this streak throughout history for the reactionary right: freeing the slaves, ending Jim Crow, women's suffrage, same-sex marriage, etc.
I don't think it's even about ruling, it's about needing to feel superior to . . . someone. Decades ago there was a wonderful article titled something like "Who Are You Better Than?". It talked about how people who know they are not, and never will be, members of the ruling class desperately need groups of people they can comfortably point to as being "beneath them". As long as they aren't at the bottom they can feel good about themselves.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
Best part about all this:
I know who the racists are in my community when they plop a Trump sign in their yard.
Also the worst part, because there are so damn many of them.
1 would be too many, but they're still the minority. they can only win if Dem turnout is low.
load more comments
(17 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)
No, no, you're doing great! Keep making a big deal about her ethnicity, you've almost got all the black voters convinced to stay home!
load more comments
(4 replies)
I thought you were smarter than that but you’re acting like a dumbass.
The rest of us caught on 8 years ago.
They saw what they wanted to see.
load more comments
(6 replies)
They are begging him to focus on policy.
Oh you sweet summer children, Trump never had any policy. If he tries to focus on it it will just further show he's all bluster no substance.
Yes, should focus more on P2025 policy and how it will be implemented. That will win over a lot of people.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump, please do three months of denying Kamala is even American. Make campaigns great again or something. Stay the course.
I mean, when they claimed Obama wasn't born in America, it worked so well!
load more comments
(3 replies)
"Trump's fans beg him to change course."
Sure, Jan. You wouldn't BE his fans if he wasn't exactly the thing he is every single day.
Anyway, is this really the thing that's a step too far? Is this the worst thing he's ever done on camera? It isn't.
It just feels worse this time because you can feel that Kamala Harris is going to beat him.
Anyway, is this really the thing that’s a step too far? Is this the worst thing he’s ever done on camera? It isn’t.
Howard Dean's political career ended because of a random scream of enthusiasm. Jeb Bush said "Please Clap."
Remember, we're talking about what the "final straw" is that broke the camel's back. The final straw may not necessarily be the heaviest one. Just the last one.
If the game is tied in the 4th quarter and your QB got picked off for the 3rd time in a row, don't be surprised when even the rest of the team starts telling the coach it may be time to bench him. It's exactly what just happened to Biden.
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Nah. He should keep doubling down. I'm sure that won't backfire. /s
I mean, he’s a weird fucking loser
You need to focus on policy.
When has he ever done that? His magnum opus was crooked Hillary and lock her up.
Do they not know that he is mostly about slogans and talking shit?
He's always focused on policy. This is him focused on policy. His policy is "whatever Trump decides is best for Trump at any given moment," and he's so dedicated to it that he got the GOP to write it into their platform.
Why do websites think that "turning off my ad-blocker" or "paying for a subscription" are my only two options?
It's the internet. The option to x out of there and go read almost the exact same article elsewhere is always a third option.
Demands only work when you have content no one else does.
I especially like how they've always loaded the full page in the background behind their popup with their little ultimatum. So they've already paid the costs in bandwidth and resources to serve up the page anyway, only for me to just close the tab on them.
load more comments
(4 replies)
That dumbfuck can’t back off. He’s unable.
Weirdest part is people being surprised...
They still don't get how much Joe was holding the party back. Anyone else would have seen these same gains
Sadly being good at governing doesn't mean being good at running in an election.
I was hoping that people could see trump presidency vs Biden presidency and see the difference, but it looks like that's not enough.
Having said that, I hope Kamala will be as good or even better than Biden in governing.
load more comments
(13 replies)
load more comments
(12 replies)
Imagine all these people thinking Trump will read their tweets and take their advice
load more comments
(2 replies)
Focusing in policy would tank him.
His whole appeal is that he has no coherent ideology, so you can project whatever views you have onto him.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Trump will interpret this as "time to double down!"
Uuh. Every conservative I know irl can't stop boasting about how hard Trump is kicking Biden and Harris's ass
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
473 points (98.2% liked)
politics
19072 readers
1869 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS